Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the_Watchman
The problem was that Iraq was not in compliance with the inspections program that they had agreed to which would allow the U.N. to monitor the situation. Without unimpeded inspections the U.N. inspectors could not verify compliance with the disarmament terms.

So, in essence, war was waged because the inspectors didn't find nor Saddam did reveal WMD that he didn't have. Am I interpreting your statement correctly?

39 posted on 02/04/2004 9:34:30 AM PST by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: varon
War was not waged because the inspectors did not find WMD, it was because they were not allowed to look. Iraq had agreed to an inspection program. They continually hampered the inspections and, indeed, were hiding weapons programs.

When a party agrees to a cessation of hostilities; i.e., the first Iraq war, then abrogates the terms of that agreement. They are inviting the resumption of warfare. Legally, the current Iraq war was the proper conclusion of the prior conflict.
44 posted on 02/04/2004 12:17:52 PM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson