Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Um...I think that the Second Temple was destroyed prior to that time. If I'm not mistaken, the Second Temple was built under the supervision of Zerubbabel in the 500s and 400s B.C. It was destroyed some time later, and a Third Temple was constructed in the last century B.C. by King Herod "the Great." It was this temple which was destroyed by the Romans in A.D. 70 under the rule of Emperor Flavius Vespasianus.
8 posted on 02/03/2004 12:36:40 PM PST by MarcoPolo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MarcoPolo
Technically, you are correct. But in common usage, the term "Second Temple" refers roughly to the period of time just before/ during / and after the reign of Herod as ruler of Roman Judea. You can check any book that deals with the history and/or literature of that period, e.g., Larry R. Helyer. Exploring Jewish Literature of the Second Temple Period. InterVarsity Press, 2002.
9 posted on 02/03/2004 12:57:24 PM PST by Remole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MarcoPolo
I think that the Second Temple was destroyed prior to that time. If I'm not mistaken, the Second Temple was built under the supervision of Zerubbabel in the 500s and 400s B.C. It was destroyed some time later, and a Third Temple was constructed in the last century B.C. by King Herod "the Great." It was this temple which was destroyed by the Romans in A.D. 70 under the rule of Emperor Flavius Vespasianus.

The Second Temple was still standing in the time of Herod, who expanded and improved it. So it was the Second Temple which was destroyed by the Romans.

11 posted on 02/03/2004 1:57:34 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson