[knighthawk]

Ping

[blitzgig]

"There has been a longstanding effort to hijack the agendas of the UN political and humanitarian organs. The 2003 general assembly saw 19 anti-Israel resolutions, although there was not even one addressing India and Pakistan's conflict over Kashmir. This stands in stark contrast to the failure of the very same assembly to muster a majority for resolutions to protect the Israeli child against terrorism. Other international bodies dedicated literally half of their agenda to discussing Israeli-Palestinian issues."

The UN could care less about innocent Israelis or Jews being murdered. Shows you how much we should care about the so-called "international community."

[mark502inf]

1-Good fences make good neighbors.

2-It is an "advisory position" that carries the same amount of weight as every other anti-Israel position established in meaningless international organizations.

3-For all the faults of the UN, the good thing is that the USA is a permanent, veto-wielding member of the Security Council. Pass all the B.S. resolutions and issue all the advisory positions you want, if it comes to actually taking action against Israel, we can block it.