Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
But physicists have predicted ‘islands of stability’ at atomic numbers 114, 120 and/or 126, where the protons and neutrons might be able to jostle themselves into a shape that minimises contact between the protons. That would allow the nucleus to hang together for much longer than its neighbours in the periodic table.

Which is still probably not very long at all by everyday commonplace expectations. ((Amateur Scientific American reader guesswork alert!!)) The nuclear strong force simply stops being strong above a certain distance. Big nuclei are unstable because they are too big for the effective strong force radius. The stability that comes from jostling into a certain shape (and keeping the mutually-repelling protons apart) would itself be subject to jostling out of shape.

4 posted on 02/03/2004 7:05:44 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
physicists have predicted ‘islands of stability’ at atomic numbers 114, 120 and/or 126, where the protons and neutrons might be able to jostle themselves into a shape that minimises contact between the protons.

That's a p*ss-poor explanation of what's going on. The islands of stability actually occur where "shells" (distinct energy levels) are filled. As far as I can tell, this has squat to do with "contact between the protons"---a concept that I don't think has much meaning in the quantum mechanical world anyway.

9 posted on 02/03/2004 7:17:30 AM PST by Winston Smith Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson