Replies

"I want Kerry's real military record. Something doesn't add up. I don't know what yet."

Not a good tactic - attacking Kerry's record when it's so much better than Bush's. The return fire on this will be severe. The spinmeisters and attack dogs for the dims want the comparison - don't be foolish enough to lead them there.

"Not a good tactic - attacking Kerry's record when it's so much better than Bush's. The return fire on this will be severe. The spinmeisters and attack dogs for the dims want the comparison - don't be foolish enough to lead them there."

What more "comparisons" do they need then GWB's leadership as C in C?????? It's kind of like a resume - you go from the most recent "examples" back as far as you need to go - so, when you do THAT comparison, it's like Kerry is already DOA!!

Not a good tactic - attacking Kerry's record when it's so much better than Bush's.

Disagree. Kerry is making his war record the centerpiece of his campaign. He never misses an opportunity to bring it up on the campaign trail. He is doing it for several reasons: contrast his service with GWB; demonstrate that the Dems can handle national security issues; and attract veteran and independent support.

Bush shouldn't cede this issue to Kerry. Kerry's war record does deserve closer scrutiny. He only served 4 months in Vietnam and requested to leave a scant 4 days after receiving his third superficial wound. Who wrote him up for his Silver and Bronze stars? Will he make the citations public? Did he committ atrocities while serving in Vietnam, as he has admitted? Moreover, his actions when he returned should also be examined.

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:vWPtWJXn-wYJ:www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm%2B&hl=en&ie=UTF-8