[TBP]

Bush has taken conservative positions on very few issues and liberal positions on most of them. If a Democraat tried to do what Bush is doing, the Republican in Congress would oppose most of it. But when a Republican does it, we have to support our President.

Sorry, it doesn't wash.

[lasereye]

Bush has taken conservative positions on very few issues and liberal positions on most of them. If a Democraat tried to do what Bush is doing, the Republican in Congress would oppose most of it. But when a Republican does it, we have to support our President.

Sorry, it doesn't wash.

What doesn't wash, that judicial selections live on long after a President is gone and his nominees have been consevative? Maybe you don't like him personally at this point, but I have yet to see any of the angry anti-Bush people give an intelligent response to my point about the courts. They either pretend that doesn't exist, or make false statements about the situation.

One person on another thread assured me that the Dems actually supported all of his nominees because they were all moderates except the four they fillibustered. The Dems were holding up several dozen of his nominees for over a year in committee before the Republicans won back the Senate in 2002. When I asked him for a few examples of who these non-conservative nominees were he gave one person who made a non-conservative ruling on guns. He also assured me nobody would leave the Supreme Court in the next four years, including the 82 year old Stevens. I guess he has a crystal ball. Maybe you have some kind of equally delusional argument.