To: lugsoul
Actually, he just says they are not "religions" for purposes of the 1st Amendment. They may be "religions" for some purposes, but not for legal protection.He's not one of those "strict construction" types, I guess.
35 posted on
02/03/2004 1:34:03 PM PST by
Scenic Sounds
(Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
To: Scenic Sounds
He is, as long as you're talking about the KJV. Everything else must be read in that context.
36 posted on
02/03/2004 1:35:39 PM PST by
lugsoul
(And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson