[Piranha]

He was, until he decided to libel him all over the internet. Apparently, he thinks that celebrities are fair bait for the public display of his wisdom whether they want it or not.

[thesummerwind]

He was, until he decided to libel him all over the internet. Apparently, he thinks that celebrities are fair bait for the public display of his wisdom whether they want it or not.

He's just a needy, self-aggrandizing, publicity hound. He's also another person who should "just shut up".

[jnarcus]

How can anyone possibly libel the pederast that Michael Jackson is? Statements which are true do not constitute libel

[GOPJ]

Look, when trashy performers hold themselves out to the public, we're allowed to comment. The first amendment protects us, the people, not just the porn pushers. Fair comment and criticism isn't "libel".

Janet looked like a 2 bit used up whore, and the young man had to use shock as a substitute for talent. Libel? Nope. If they can't take the opinions of the public, they don't belong on the stage.

He was, until he decided to libel him all over the Internet. Apparently, he thinks that celebrities are fair bait for the public display of his wisdom whether they want it or not.

[VOA]

He was, until he decided to libel him all over the internet.

This should be interesting...when Michael Jackson takes the Rabbi to court.

Maybe the Rabbi said something actionable on the Internet...but what I heard
him say on the radio (Dennis Prager Show?) was basically "I tried to tell him
that if he kept on doing the same old things, he was going to get in big trouble" and
that Jackson rejected the advice.

IIRC, in that interview, the Rabbi never gave the specifics on Jackson's
personal lifestyle...just that he'd told Jackson that thing had to change.