To: Ragirl
I hate to say it too, and two months ago, I was loudly proclaiming, 'landslide, landslide', but I agree w/you. I have this sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach that the Kay report was the coup de grace.
One thing I'm hoping for though, is that I'm as wrong on this as I have been on other things in my life.
36 posted on
02/02/2004 7:37:14 PM PST by
AlbionGirl
("Ha cambiato occhi per la coda.")
To: AlbionGirl
41 posted on
02/02/2004 7:39:36 PM PST by
KQQL
(@)
To: All
http://www.gopusa.com/barbarastock/2004/bs_0126.shtml
has a lot of info about Mr. Kerry.
"The senator was the head of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs in 1992. He pushed vigorously to normalize relations with Vietnam. He visited Vietnam and praised them for being open and reported he was convinced they were not holding American POWs." [end excerpt]
Who was he looking out for?
Answer:
"The answer is special interests and money. Collier's International, based in Boston, was immediately awarded the exclusive contract to rebuild Vietnam's infrastructure by the Vietnamese government. They made tens of millions of dollars from the contract. The chief executive officer of Collier's International was a man named C. Stewart Forbes. Interestingly, Senator Kerry's middle name is Forbes. There is a reason for that. C. Stewart Forbes is John Kerry's cousin."
To: AlbionGirl; Ragirl
My goodness, you will both have ulcers by November at this rate. It's a long time until the elections.
The RATS are getting all the publicity now because of their primary. It's my opinion that the WMD issue isn't over yet, but we will see.
Anyway, it's silly to start discounting the President before he even starts campaigning. Chins up now!!
Prairie
51 posted on
02/02/2004 7:42:23 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: AlbionGirl
Frankly,I think the Kay report, when properly reported, makes Bush look damn good. When the amply people are reminded of Kerry's concurrence regarding WMDS, this issue will turn in Bush's favor. I also think there's more to the WMD issue than meets the eye. Somethings brewing
58 posted on
02/02/2004 7:48:27 PM PST by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for Girls!)
To: AlbionGirl
Go listen to the Kay report on c-span. I honestly believe you will have different feeling.
Did the media report what our military was doing in Iraq and - are they now reporting what our military is doing in Iraq. The answer is NO!
Is the President quoted correctly when he talked about the danger of the WMD. That WMD were not the reason we went into Iraq. The answer is NO!
Kay's report is not my worry, my worry is voter fraud, which will br rampant. My fear is that there will be an attack for which President Bush will be blamed. We were not safe during the Clinton's time, we are not safe now, and will never be again.
105 posted on
02/02/2004 8:28:56 PM PST by
malia
(BUSH/CHENEY '04 NEVER FORGET!)
To: AlbionGirl
Note the Kay testimony also said that he (Kay) supported the invasion of Iraq anyway ...
106 posted on
02/02/2004 8:29:12 PM PST by
1066AD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson