How can I disagree? Assume that God made a tree fully formed. Is there anything blasphemous about asserting that the current state of the tree implies a history of growth and development? The earth and the universe have a history, regardless of when and how they came into being. That history is not consistent with a simple literal reading of the Bible. Even though both "stories" might be true.
"The earth and the universe have a history, regardless of when and how they came into being. That history is not consistent with a simple literal reading of the Bible. Even though both "stories" might be true."Agreed, but there is dispute about what that history tells us. Evolutionists reject any findings that conclude a different history than they have imagined. When they reject the science based on the conclusion, instead of on the science itself, then they show themselves to be biased.
That's what this thread was about.