Let Us Unite Behind President Bush ( A Plea Message to all Freepers)

FE/2/04 | JVERITAS

[ambrose]

"I really appreciate the support of all my supporters on the Free Republic. I look forward to being appointed Chief Justice of the United State Supreme Court by the newly elected Democratic president."

[NY.SS-Bar9]

If you want to see the result of abandoning your principles and looking at the "big picture" look no further than New York State.

Out of control spending, gun control, and an extraconstitutional "Nanny state".

Conservatives are taken for granted because they have no where else to go just like Blacks in America have little political clout because the Democrats take them for granted.

George Pataki, George Bush, and the rest of the RINO's have gotten my last vote. If that means President Hillary - so be it. I am afraid we are too far gone as it is.

[swarthyguy]

Yep. Your post exemplifies exactly what I mean.

Threats, Stalinist innuendo epitomised by the following quote -

"If we end up with a Democrat president as a result, I do hope people are ashamed of their decision to abdicate their responsibility to vote"

Oh, the shame, the horror.

Try Dale Carnegie on persuading people. Empty threats and revengeful vitriol are not convincing.

And you got the wrong guy; where have I said vote for a Dem.

Hysterical.

Keep digging.

[swarthyguy]

I agree with you and VDH.

But politicians are not Gods, and should most certainly not be immune to criticism.

[Howlin]

To: honeygrl

"Bush needs to move back over to the right a little if I'm going to be motivated to vote for him."

Any person claiming to be conservative who is not motivated to keep the Democrats out of power after knowing EXACTLY what they will do with it if given the opportunity, has a real problem with reality. They're either political martyrs, have not been paying attention to what the Democrat candidates have been promising they will do if elected, or are ignoring (or are totally or willfully ignorant of) the history of the last seventy years, or are incredibly dense or insane, or have a morbid desire to toil their lives away in the misery of a Liberal Hell! Any person who would support a third party candidate who has absolutely zero chance of winning even one state or even a single electoral vote is so politically naive and devoid of the brainpower that The Creator so graciously endowed upon them, that it's not even worth wasting pixels on.

And I can tell you, that I probably won't be wasting very many more pixels on people who are coming to FR to trash and bash our candidates and or to trash and bash and drive away the very posters I'm trying to attract. If the intent of third party supporters is to cause as much hell and discontent on our forum and to inflict as much damage to FR as they possibly can, well, I can assure you we will have many fewer third party posters left on FR very soon. The LePur colony can have them. Thank you very much.

It might be different if there was a primary involved. These kind of battles need to take place as part of the process of selecting the best person to run. In this case, there will be no primary. God willing and barring any major disasters, George W. Bush will be the candidate. So it will either be Bush or one of the Democrats that gets elected. No one else stands a snowball's chance in hell. And I've given every person on this web site plenty of advance notice (I've been saying it for the last three years) that FR will NOT be used to help replace Bush with a Democrat. Period. End of story.

Again, if that is your intent, leave now or get yourself banned later. Excessive and repetitive attacks on our candidates or our posters will not be tolerated. Try your luck at DUh or LibertyPost. In presidential politics, they are interchangeable.

712 posted on 02/01/2004 6:55:33 PM EST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[Jim Robinson]

"Bush needs to move back over to the right a little if I'm going to be motivated to vote for him."

Any person claiming to be conservative who is not motivated to keep the Democrats out of power after knowing EXACTLY what they will do with it if given the opportunity, has a real problem with reality. They're either political martyrs, have not been paying attention to what the Democrat candidates have been promising they will do if elected, or are ignoring (or are totally or willfully ignorant of) the history of the last seventy years, or are incredibly dense or insane, or have a morbid desire to toil their lives away in the misery of a Liberal Hell! Any person who would support a third party candidate who has absolutely zero chance of winning even one state or even a single electoral vote is so politically naive and devoid of the brainpower that The Creator so graciously endowed upon them, that it's not even worth wasting pixels on.

And I can tell you, that I probably won't be wasting very many more pixels on people who are coming to FR to trash and bash our candidates and or to trash and bash and drive away the very posters I'm trying to attract. If the intent of third party supporters is to cause as much hell and discontent on our forum and to inflict as much damage to FR as they possibly can, well, I can assure you we will have many fewer third party posters left on FR very soon. The LePur colony can have them. Thank you very much.

It might be different if there was a primary involved. These kind of battles need to take place as part of the process of selecting the best person to run. In this case, there will be no primary. God willing and barring any major disasters, George W. Bush will be the candidate. So it will either be Bush or one of the Democrats that gets elected. No one else stands a snowball's chance in hell. And I've given every person on this web site plenty of advance notice (I've been saying it for the last three years) that FR will NOT be used to help replace Bush with a Democrat. Period. End of story.

Again, if that is your intent, leave now or get yourself banned later. Excessive and repetitive attacks on our candidates or our posters will not be tolerated. Try your luck at DUh or LibertyPost. In presidential politics, they are interchangeable.

[Peach]

Threats? Stalinistic techniques. Stalin who murdered millions of people and you are comparing me to him. You sick twisted puppy.

[jla]

[Brad’s Gramma]

If that means President Hillary - so be it.

Oh, now THAT'S using your noodle.

[Right Wing Professor]

Decpetive. During the Presidencies of Bush I and Reagan, we had a Cold War military. Look at the defense spending numbers. Non-discretionary spending under Bush II is higher than under X-42, Bush I, and Reagan. These are disgraceful numbers for a conservative President.

[Peach]

AND - I wasn't responding directly to you. Get a grip man. YOu are out of control and have obviously not read Jim Robinson's comments regarding posts like yours. DO an in forum review - he wrote about posters like you last night.

[Howlin]

See #25.

[Howlin]

I posted it for them to read in #25.

[Brad’s Gramma]

If this isn't a concerted effort by some(one) I don't know what it is.

What a bunch of ........ 's.

[Brad’s Gramma]

Sure I'm not a Loserdopian or a Democrat?

Even though you didn't address that to me....no, I'M not sure. I think you've tilted right on over to one of them though.

[swarthyguy]

>>AND - I wasn't responding directly to you.

Oh, OK, the post being addressed as a reply to me must have got me confused.

Posts like mine? What is so "crossing the line" about that.

I wasn't aware that I had transgressed any protocols by asking for persuasive arguments and civility.

[Peach]

Thank you Howlin. The guy is seriously sick.

[Mo1]

I guess he/she misses the good old days of Jimmy Cart huh?

[Brad’s Gramma]

Oh, read on.

[swarthyguy]

Well, it's certainly good that I do not base my vote for Bush on what you say.

But if I was more thin skinned than I am, I may actually take some of this stuff to heart.