This is from the Washington Posterier, so I could only post excerpts from the article. You can read the whole thing.
To: GulliverSwift
I guess Janet got enough boost in career from the magazine cover of her naked with a guys hands over her breasts that she thought this would be a career booster too.
I hope it fails miserably.
2 posted on
02/02/2004 12:37:16 PM PST by
DannyTN
To: GulliverSwift
wonder if CBS paid them since they caused so much trouble.
sounds like crocodile tears to me.
3 posted on
02/02/2004 12:39:08 PM PST by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: GulliverSwift
To be sure, I am no shrink. However, I admit to speculation that Ms. Jackson was (consciously or unconsiously) enabling her other dysfunctional sibling (Michael) when she did this. In an attempt to distract people away from him, she displays her own illness. Frankly, I think the entire Jackson family should be in therapy.
To: GulliverSwift
I haven't read the article but my opinion on her performance is that it smacked of decadence much like that of the 20s Germany highly erotic; whips and chains, angry, tasteless and thoroughly disgusting. Hardly the fare for family, more something you would see in some smoky cabaret - Inappropriate for the Super Bowl centerpiece entertainment the Super Bowl half time has turned into a PigsSty. Inappropriate period.
8 posted on
02/02/2004 12:46:10 PM PST by
yoe
(Join STOP Hillary PAC.com 2111 Wilson Blvd #700, Arlington, VA 22201)
To: GulliverSwift
9 posted on
02/02/2004 12:47:15 PM PST by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: GulliverSwift
Someone should tell MTV and Ms. Jackson that having breasts is not something that is unique to her, and that you'd have to be a pretty desperate loser to think hers are anything special. It was about as enticing and interesting as a fart in a church.
14 posted on
02/02/2004 12:59:50 PM PST by
XJarhead
To: GulliverSwift
"Janet gets nasty"
Yawn.
15 posted on
02/02/2004 1:01:02 PM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: GulliverSwift
The incident was planned from the onset. Take a look at the closeup of the offending mammary on Drudge. There is one snap fastner on the garment to the right of her breast and possibly a second below. So the garment appears to have been fabricated with the ability to have the cup removed. Is that standard on such garments, especially those expensive handmade ones intended to be danced in?? Hmmmm. While Ms. Jackson is, of course, entitled to have her nipple pierced (thats how the starburst is held on), isn't it interesting that she chose to wear that particular device when no one would see it unless she lost...but they claim it wasn't intended. Let's see, what's missing...a Michael Jackson smirk??
16 posted on
02/02/2004 1:01:34 PM PST by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: GulliverSwift
MTV is for perpetual adolescents.
To: GulliverSwift
Not impressed with Jackson (whose brother is Wacky Jacky--must run in the family), Timberlake (the pervert), CBS nor MTV for pulling a stunt like this. Makes me think of Roseanne playing with her crotch a few years ago while singing the national anthem. Bad taste! Porn! All involved should be penalized for indecent exposure.
33 posted on
02/02/2004 1:44:42 PM PST by
lilylangtree
(Olde English takes a long time to say, and we never say anything unless it takes a long time to say)
To: GulliverSwift
"...closely watched by CBS suits to make sure there was no hanky-panky, except of course the simulated-sex dance."<<
This sentence alone leaves CBS without excuse.
34 posted on
02/02/2004 1:46:22 PM PST by
SerpentDove
(Today is the first day of the rest of your life. Don't louse it up.)
To: GulliverSwift
What WAS planned AND rehearsed was the "apology" by Timberlake, MTV, etc.
To: GulliverSwift
There could hardly be a less flattering pic of Janet than the one posted on Drudge, with her boob hanging out. What makes it worse is the "duh" expression on her face. She looks tired, a has-been. And the close-up of her tit with that little star/wheel-cover thingie with a has to be a tiny happy face on it...I am at a loss for words.
To: GulliverSwift
Did anyone warn Bill Clinton that if you leave a VCR on freeze frame too ling it can ruin the tape?
To: GulliverSwift
Did anyone warn Bill Clinton that if you leave a VCR on freeze frame too long it can ruin the tape?
To: GulliverSwift
I used to think how silly all those people were who said Elvis shaking his hips on Ed Sullivan would eventually lead us here. I guess they were right after all.
46 posted on
02/02/2004 6:02:08 PM PST by
DMZFrank
To: GulliverSwift
Janet is way too old to have stooped to such an immature low. She is by far..the trashiest female but still not holding a candle to Pamela Anderson. I'm ashamed to be part of her race. This women's whole family is disgusting and needs to be taught a lesson. She nor her brother have any sympathy from me.
AA
To: GulliverSwift
Thread #41 in the ongoing
nipplegate saga.
Check the keyword
nipplegate for all the latest coverage in this developing story...
52 posted on
02/03/2004 9:50:01 AM PST by
flashbunny
("Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig." -Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson