Skip to comments.
Bush Unveils Plan to Restrain Spending
Talon News / GOP USA ^
| Feb. 2, 2004
| Jeff Gannon
Posted on 02/02/2004 7:44:58 AM PST by prairiebreeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: windchime
Or hard-nosed to the point of absurdity. Where there is no compromise there is no progress. What you quoted sounds like the cutting of noses to spite faces and not a quality I want to see in my elected officials anymore than thoughtless, reckless, unfettered spending.
Prairie
61
posted on
02/02/2004 6:37:42 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: prairiebreeze
Horse-n-pony show. They did some polling and the base is pi**ed. But they also think the base is stupid. Just have to fool 'em with a few press releases and some imaginary cuts.
What's a Gov't spending cut these days; 5-7% increase?
62
posted on
02/02/2004 6:40:49 PM PST
by
Swanks
To: Miles Vorkosigan
Thank you for that wonderful post ..... it seems too simple to some people but many of us really do appreciate this great country .... and the military who have fought and died to defend it through the generations. God bless you!
63
posted on
02/02/2004 6:54:08 PM PST
by
kayak
(Have you prayed for our President and our troops today?)
To: prairiebreeze
Bump to that!
64
posted on
02/02/2004 7:08:27 PM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: Mulder
The good news for you is that you are free to leave America. Go live someplace else, be happy elsewhere. Not all can claim that freedom but you certainly can.
Go for it, if you are so unhappy or disillusioned here.
Prairie
65
posted on
02/02/2004 7:33:39 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: prairiebreeze
The good news for you is that you are free to leave America Yeah, but they'll take that away in a few years.
Go for it, if you are so unhappy or disillusioned here.
I'm not leaving, nor do I have any desire too. The 'domestic enemies of the Constitution' are the ones that need to leave.
66
posted on
02/02/2004 7:45:44 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: Mulder
Yeah, but they'll take that away in a few years.Nonsense.
The 'domestic enemies of the Constitution' are the ones that need to leave.
That I'd probably agree with. I'm just pointing out the you DO have options available to you that many in the world don't.
Prairie
67
posted on
02/02/2004 7:50:28 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: Mulder
The 'domestic enemies of the Constitution' are the ones that need to leave.Ah, but they have the freedom to stay here, unlike in some countries where they would be exiled (or worse).
68
posted on
02/02/2004 7:56:20 PM PST
by
kayak
(Have you prayed for our President and our troops today?)
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Thanks for posting that table.
One conclusion that I draw from it is that Bush is as big a spender as his predacessors. And unlike Reagan, he has a Republican Congress. And unlike Reagan, he is spending signifantly less on defense, and more on other programs.
Another conclusion is the massive growth in entitlement programs, which Bush has expanded. Most recently with his prescription drugs plan. To his credit, he has proposed some privatization of social security, but I really have to question how hard he is pushing for this.
Also, I expect the "FY 04" numbers to only get bigger since they are only proposals at this point.
69
posted on
02/02/2004 7:58:17 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: prairiebreeze
Nonsense. They are making it harder to leave the country. At least if you want to take your assets with you.
Clinton tried to enact edicts making it much more difficult to exit the country with your assets.
And Bush enacted one where you can take your money out of the country, but if you don't fill out the proper "permission forms", that in and of itself is considered a crime and you automatically forfeit the money.
70
posted on
02/02/2004 8:01:24 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: kayak
Ah, but they have the freedom to stay here, unlike in some countries where they would be exiled (or worse). And that's a good thing?
I happen to believe that those who are actively and illegally engaged in overthrowing the Constitution and Bill of Rights should be exiled or worse.
71
posted on
02/02/2004 8:02:52 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: Mulder
It's a good thing if one truly believes in freedom .... and not just freedom for those who agree with them.
When the President went to Great Britain, the media covered all the protests (while ignoring the thousands of people who lined the streets in support of Bush and Blair). At one press conference, one of the tacky journalists asked the President about all the protestors. Bush's response was that they were fortunate to live in a free country where dissent was allowed .... and that now the people of Iraq have that freedom also.
Yes, there are a lot of citizens in this country whom I would love to see put on a slow boat to China. But they have as much right to be here as I do ... and to speak their piece, no matter how distasteful their views might be to me.
72
posted on
02/02/2004 8:40:05 PM PST
by
kayak
(Have you prayed for our President and our troops today?)
To: kayak
But they have as much right to be here as I do ... and to speak their piece, no matter how distasteful their views might be to me. There is a big difference between "speaking your piece" and engaging in a criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States Constitution.
The former is harmless, while the latter is an overt act of treason against all Americans.
Now if people want to exercise their Right to Free speech to modify the Constitution through the lawfully proscribed process, then that is certianly their Right.
But if the want to attempt to subvert the Constitution through means other than a Constitutional amendment, AND act to do so, then they have crossed the line between Free speech and sedition.
73
posted on
02/02/2004 8:49:37 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: Mulder
How do you argue then the biggest growth in 25 years? The lowest interest rates in what 45 years now?
You do realize that we were ALREADY in a recession *before* President Bush took office?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson