Replies

If I knew the answer I wouldn't have asked. Clearly you don't approve of breasts at all, whether they are portrayed in a religious setting, or in the sports arena.

I was not trying to shock or offend you, but neither do I care whether you are. I initially wanted to know why you thought breasts were okay in God's house but not in Houston, but at this point, I really don't care anymore.

What house of God is it that portrays men ripping off womens blouses to expose their breasts?

No, Jim, I think the event was meant to shock. As I said elsewhere, I was at work at the hospital, where virtually every patient or their visitors were watching the superbowl. I think the event was MEANT to offend, because some people clearly think it's hilarious or otherwise has an impact to fart, curse, or behave crudely.

If MTV wanted to show an ordinary breast in a way that wasn't meant to shock and offend, I'm sure they could have found a way.

Body parts are not offensive to me, as you assert--but patients and families were offended by the show. I didn't see it, but they were outraged, and they were angry. MTV can do what it wants and will, clearly. But I think superbowl viewership in the future will suffer for this stupid stunt.