Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlazingArizona
Well, as I wrote the FCC
"since you exist and taxpayers pay for you, why don't you do your job and heavily fine" all involved. I don't approve of them, but since we are presently stuck with them (at our expense) they should serve some purpose.
100 posted on 02/01/2004 10:55:43 PM PST by Annie03 (donate at www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Annie03
"since you exist and taxpayers pay for you, why don't you do your job and heavily fine" all involved.

So far as I'm concerned, the only function of the FCC should be to act as a neutral recorder of deeds to freely auctioned spectrum space. That activity can be financed by a small broadcaster fee. We don;t need a federal agency in carge of specifying moral culture.<> I'm not arguing for moral relativism here. Parents should have every right to control what their kids watch on the media until they reach adulthood, but cheap technology exists for parents to control what their offspring see on the TV and Internet they receive at home.

Whic harms our children more - seeing a bare boob on a football game show or having an endless of liberal news pundits pound anti-capitalism, anti-technology and anti-Americanism into their little skulls full of mush?

126 posted on 02/02/2004 6:08:42 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson