Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prodigal Son
If it was OK for Timberlake to rip open Janet Jackson's top and expose her to the world, by your logic, since a breast is merely a generic body part, you'd have no objection to any woman, anywhere, exposing a breast or two, or her pubic area?

In this culture, a woman whose breasts are exposed, in absence of a maternal feeding process, is being indecently exposed. In this culture, gratuitous exposing of breasts and pubic areas is considered obscene. Such acts are violations of long held community standards of decency.

Is that hard to comprehend?

282 posted on 02/01/2004 9:00:43 PM PST by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: Thumper1960; Prodigal Son; Jim Robinson
Is that hard to comprehend?

I think Prodigal Son is on the wrong forum. Perhaps he should try DU.

291 posted on 02/01/2004 9:03:04 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: Thumper1960
you'd have no objection to any woman, anywhere, exposing a breast or two, or her pubic area?

Personally? No. It wouldn't bother me overly.

292 posted on 02/01/2004 9:03:19 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: Thumper1960
Janet and Justin are the latest item even though she is 40 or something and he is 22 anyways there stupid sexy dancing they were trying to project to the viewing audience who could of cared less, led them to Justin exposing Janet's "toto" it was laughable yet typical of
the crap MTV puts out...
296 posted on 02/01/2004 9:05:47 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson