Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prodigal Son
Oh dear God! Not a female breast!

The breast didn't offend me very much. It was the manner in which it was exposed. It was bad enough to have her standing with a bunch of leather fetish "dancers" writhing on the floor, but the manner in which Timberlake ripped off the blouse was very crude. She actually seemed offended and ashamed by it. Is that what we want to teach the kids who are watching? That women should be pushed around and then be ashamed of themselves? That it's alright to publicly grope/humiliate a woman? Even if it was planned ahead of time, she made it look like an unwelcome advance. To put that on national television is creepy. The breast and the tinfoil attached to it don't bother me much at all relative to that.

157 posted on 02/01/2004 8:13:04 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: xm177e2
Re: It was the manner in which it was exposed.

Agreed. It has all the smackings of an assault.

171 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:20 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: xm177e2
It was the manner in which it was exposed.

What would your rather see? Janet expose her breast or a lesbian kiss? Personally, the breast exposure by Janet pales in comparison to the degradation of values that accompaniest the lesbian kiss by Madonna/B.Spears.

172 posted on 02/01/2004 8:15:42 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson