Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel's 'execution' troops face death quiz
Observer ^ | Sunday February 1, 2004 | Conal Urquhart

Posted on 02/01/2004 10:02:13 AM PST by munozjoe

Conal Urquhart reports from Nablus on what the army says was an anti-terrorist operation, but witnesses describe as cold-blooded killing

The Israeli army is under growing pressure to explain a series of deaths of Palestinians in a three-week operation in the West Bank city of Nablus. According to witnesses and medical evidence, at least two of the 19 deaths during the operation have the hallmarks of executions.

The operation was launched on 16 December to track down Naif Sharekh, who the army say was behind the movement of suicide bombers from Nablus to Israel. The UN representative in the city described it as 'one of the largest military operations in Nablus since Operation Defensive Shield started in April 2002'.

By the time the army reduced its presence on 6 January, it had killed four gunmen and 15 unarmed civilians including six children.

One Israeli and one Palestinian human rights group are investigating the killings and want the army to launch its own inquiry, but it is reluctant.

Following the shooting of British student Tom Hurndall, 21, last year, it insisted that its soldiers had shot an armed terrorist. Six months later, following immense pressure from the Hurndall family, the army charged one of its soldiers with unlawful killing.

Ala Dawaya, 21, was on his way to work as a baker when he was shot by Israeli soldiers in the old town of Nablus on 18 December. An ambulance was called and driver Adnan Soso arrived to see the wounded man sitting upright and still alive a few metres from an army Jeep.

'I was called at around 3am to an area known as the onion market,' he said. 'I got there within about three minutes and saw an injured man lying against a wall within metres of an Israeli Jeep.'

He reversed to the end of the street, from where he could still see the injured man and the Jeep. 'Then they started shooting at the man from the Jeep. Every time they shot, the body moved and they waited then shot again, sometimes twice. They shot him about ten times over several minutes,' he said.

Eventually, the shooting stopped and the Jeep allowed the ambulance to approach. 'The man was dead and both his eyeballs were hanging out. I looked at what he had in the black plastic bag next to him. Trousers, shoes and an overall, covered in flour. We put him on a stretcher and got him into the ambulance.

'As we were about to pull away, the Jeep approached. The soldier said: 'Is he dead?' He then asked what was in the bag and I showed him. He asked for the dead man's identification card and spoke on the radio for a few minutes. He then told us to take the body away.'

The ambulance took the body to Rafidia Hospital where it was examined by Dr Samir Abu Zarour. Although not trained in post-mortems, he is the closest thing to an expert in Nablus, having examined 250 shooting victims in the past three years.

'He had been shot between eight and 10 times, including twice in the face and once in the testicles, and had a series of fragmentation wounds in his legs,' he said.

The army spokesman said that Nablus was under curfew at the time of the shooting in order to separate civilians from terrorists.

'Soldiers identified a terrorist planting an explosive device in the road. They shot him and when they examined the bag, it contained explosive material, as suspected. They later discovered he was a member of Islamic Jihad.' The spokesman denied soldiers had shot him several times.

On 7 January, as part of the same operation, a large number of troops entered the al Makhsia neighbourhood around 3am, surrounded the house of the Qassas family and ordered them to leave, according to Mofida Qassas. 'My father, my uncle and aunt and I had to leave, but they kept my four brothers inside. The last time I saw Abdul he was tying his shoelaces surrounded by Israeli soldiers,' she said.

Addul Qassas, 25, had returned to Nablus from Saudi Arabia two years ago after learning to make curtains at a relative's business. His three brothers were taken away by the Israelis. One remains in jail, but the others were released. The soldiers searched the house, spraying some rooms with bullets and a prolonged gun battle began outside. Witnesses were unable to say what was happening because they were keeping their heads down. Qassas was taken to the next door garden, where he was questioned. Nobody saw what happened to him.

Amra Sadija, a secretary at the Palestinian Ministry of Education, said: 'The shooting was continuous for hours. Between 5am and 6am, I heard a man screaming. He kept repeating: "I swear to God, I don't know who he is." His voice was so high I could not recognise who it was. I could not tell what happened to him because there was still shooting everywhere. Eventually, everything went silent. At about 6am, I heard movement and at 6.30am the soldiers moved out.'

Neighbours found the body of Qassas metres from his home. Again the body was taken to Rafidia Hospital and Dr Zarour. 'I was called at 6.45am and arrived at the hospital 7am. Abdul Qassas had been shot twice, once through the upper lip with the bullet leaving the body in the middle of the back,' he said.

The bullet's trajectory suggested the victim was kneeling when he was shot, said Zarour and the size of the wounds suggest it was fired from a range of between three and five metres.

The army spokesman said soldiers spotted Qassas hiding and feared he was a sniper: 'They began an arrest procedure, shouting at him in Arabic and Hebrew. They fired warning shots. Then, fearing he was about to shoot, they shot him. He was found to be unarmed, but the soldiers later found out he was a wanted man.'

His family do not know why Abdul was shot, but it is possible the troops suspected him of sheltering a man whose body was found in the same garden that morning. Ibrahim Atawi, 32, was a senior figure in the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade in Nablus.

It is not clear whether he was involved in the gunbattle or how he died. Zarour said: 'His body was like a collander. I counted 15 bullet wounds of different calibres and there could have been more. Three bullets were fired directly at his nose. His right knee had been smashed to pieces. I think it was with a rock because the injuries looked as if there had been a grinding effect. Also his trousers were shredded around the knee and there were bits of grass on his skin and in his flesh.'

His left arm had been cut twice with a knife and there were what looked like dog bites on his arm and around his testicles. 'I do not have the expertise to say if the wounds were administered before or after he was shot,' he said.

The army spokesman said Atawi approached soldiers with a handgun. 'They fired before he could shoot them. The gun was later found to be loaded.' He denied Atawi had the injuries the doctor alleges.

The high number of deaths in Nablus over Christmas and their brutal nature have largely been ignored by human rights groups and the media because Nablus is isolated, but slowly people are beginning to pay attention.

Noam Hossfatter, a spokesman for B'tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said they were examining Qassas' death with a view to pressing the army to investigate: 'At the moment there is no eyewitness, so we cannot yet say there was an execution but if someone was in custody and was then found dead it would suggest something very unusual took place.'

Bassem Eid, director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, said his organisation's lawyer was expected to write to the Israeli military attorney-general asking him to investigate.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: RobertMillerSen
Turks are not Arabs.
Turks have traditionally taken a laid back view on religion. This has been the norm for 1400 years and is true for Oghur Turks, Oghuzz Turks, and Uyghurs.
65 posted on 02/03/2004 11:33:09 AM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe; RobertMillerSen; Namara
I didn't ban him. His own stupidity got him banned. I had absolutely zero to do with it.

Didn't read much of your ignorant freepmail, btw. It was full of even more freewheeling stupidity than you've displayed on this thread. You can come back as RobertMillerSen or namara or anything you want, DUmmy, but your ignorance and stupidity will always out you. Ciao, chump.

66 posted on 02/03/2004 1:19:58 PM PST by LibWhacker (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobertMillerSen
Restrict it on Palestinians or not, it is racist any way.

Nonsense, a laughable charge. It is irrefutable that "Palestinian" children are bred to murder Jews by the PA media, schools and communities. If you are not aware of this I suggest you make yourself more aware before you comment on it.

67 posted on 02/03/2004 2:53:55 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I have the bad fortune to be away when something really interesting happens. It appears that this thread has been struck with a weapon of mass moderatorion and some of the fallout ended up in my mailbox. I am wondering if I should delete it, call the moderators attention to it, or treasure it as my first FR spam from DU? or whoever.
68 posted on 02/03/2004 10:00:15 PM PST by DeepDish (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
Lol, was it a long one from "Namara?" Mine was. I deleted it. After all, you'll probably never want to read it again; stupid people are b-o-r-i-n-g.
69 posted on 02/03/2004 11:47:05 PM PST by LibWhacker (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
"Military action without support of the United Nations just causes more hatred"

They don't give a rat's rump about the support of the UN. Pure smoke. Defeat makes enemies mad - not a revelation. If they are enemies I don't care how mad they are, they can get so mad both eyes pop out and their testicles drop off if that is what floats their boat. Did we ask whether the invasion of Normandy was going to PO the Waffen SS?

Here's my advice. Go to Gaza or the west bank and explain to them how tossing bombs at us and our allies is only going to make us even more mad, and to find away out of this vicious cycle of violence they had better surrender right away. Because it has grown a bit stale over on this end.

70 posted on 02/03/2004 11:58:49 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Expository deleted.(/grin)


I had to look the word up, I know that I am using an adjective as a noun. But I like the sound of it and considering the nature of the deletion I think it will pass muster.

Exposition:
A setting forth of meaning or intent.

A statement or rhetorical discourse intended to give information about or an explanation of difficult material.
The art or technique of composing such discourses.
71 posted on 02/04/2004 12:10:16 AM PST by DeepDish (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson