Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel's 'execution' troops face death quiz
Observer ^ | Sunday February 1, 2004 | Conal Urquhart

Posted on 02/01/2004 10:02:13 AM PST by munozjoe

Conal Urquhart reports from Nablus on what the army says was an anti-terrorist operation, but witnesses describe as cold-blooded killing

The Israeli army is under growing pressure to explain a series of deaths of Palestinians in a three-week operation in the West Bank city of Nablus. According to witnesses and medical evidence, at least two of the 19 deaths during the operation have the hallmarks of executions.

The operation was launched on 16 December to track down Naif Sharekh, who the army say was behind the movement of suicide bombers from Nablus to Israel. The UN representative in the city described it as 'one of the largest military operations in Nablus since Operation Defensive Shield started in April 2002'.

By the time the army reduced its presence on 6 January, it had killed four gunmen and 15 unarmed civilians including six children.

One Israeli and one Palestinian human rights group are investigating the killings and want the army to launch its own inquiry, but it is reluctant.

Following the shooting of British student Tom Hurndall, 21, last year, it insisted that its soldiers had shot an armed terrorist. Six months later, following immense pressure from the Hurndall family, the army charged one of its soldiers with unlawful killing.

Ala Dawaya, 21, was on his way to work as a baker when he was shot by Israeli soldiers in the old town of Nablus on 18 December. An ambulance was called and driver Adnan Soso arrived to see the wounded man sitting upright and still alive a few metres from an army Jeep.

'I was called at around 3am to an area known as the onion market,' he said. 'I got there within about three minutes and saw an injured man lying against a wall within metres of an Israeli Jeep.'

He reversed to the end of the street, from where he could still see the injured man and the Jeep. 'Then they started shooting at the man from the Jeep. Every time they shot, the body moved and they waited then shot again, sometimes twice. They shot him about ten times over several minutes,' he said.

Eventually, the shooting stopped and the Jeep allowed the ambulance to approach. 'The man was dead and both his eyeballs were hanging out. I looked at what he had in the black plastic bag next to him. Trousers, shoes and an overall, covered in flour. We put him on a stretcher and got him into the ambulance.

'As we were about to pull away, the Jeep approached. The soldier said: 'Is he dead?' He then asked what was in the bag and I showed him. He asked for the dead man's identification card and spoke on the radio for a few minutes. He then told us to take the body away.'

The ambulance took the body to Rafidia Hospital where it was examined by Dr Samir Abu Zarour. Although not trained in post-mortems, he is the closest thing to an expert in Nablus, having examined 250 shooting victims in the past three years.

'He had been shot between eight and 10 times, including twice in the face and once in the testicles, and had a series of fragmentation wounds in his legs,' he said.

The army spokesman said that Nablus was under curfew at the time of the shooting in order to separate civilians from terrorists.

'Soldiers identified a terrorist planting an explosive device in the road. They shot him and when they examined the bag, it contained explosive material, as suspected. They later discovered he was a member of Islamic Jihad.' The spokesman denied soldiers had shot him several times.

On 7 January, as part of the same operation, a large number of troops entered the al Makhsia neighbourhood around 3am, surrounded the house of the Qassas family and ordered them to leave, according to Mofida Qassas. 'My father, my uncle and aunt and I had to leave, but they kept my four brothers inside. The last time I saw Abdul he was tying his shoelaces surrounded by Israeli soldiers,' she said.

Addul Qassas, 25, had returned to Nablus from Saudi Arabia two years ago after learning to make curtains at a relative's business. His three brothers were taken away by the Israelis. One remains in jail, but the others were released. The soldiers searched the house, spraying some rooms with bullets and a prolonged gun battle began outside. Witnesses were unable to say what was happening because they were keeping their heads down. Qassas was taken to the next door garden, where he was questioned. Nobody saw what happened to him.

Amra Sadija, a secretary at the Palestinian Ministry of Education, said: 'The shooting was continuous for hours. Between 5am and 6am, I heard a man screaming. He kept repeating: "I swear to God, I don't know who he is." His voice was so high I could not recognise who it was. I could not tell what happened to him because there was still shooting everywhere. Eventually, everything went silent. At about 6am, I heard movement and at 6.30am the soldiers moved out.'

Neighbours found the body of Qassas metres from his home. Again the body was taken to Rafidia Hospital and Dr Zarour. 'I was called at 6.45am and arrived at the hospital 7am. Abdul Qassas had been shot twice, once through the upper lip with the bullet leaving the body in the middle of the back,' he said.

The bullet's trajectory suggested the victim was kneeling when he was shot, said Zarour and the size of the wounds suggest it was fired from a range of between three and five metres.

The army spokesman said soldiers spotted Qassas hiding and feared he was a sniper: 'They began an arrest procedure, shouting at him in Arabic and Hebrew. They fired warning shots. Then, fearing he was about to shoot, they shot him. He was found to be unarmed, but the soldiers later found out he was a wanted man.'

His family do not know why Abdul was shot, but it is possible the troops suspected him of sheltering a man whose body was found in the same garden that morning. Ibrahim Atawi, 32, was a senior figure in the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade in Nablus.

It is not clear whether he was involved in the gunbattle or how he died. Zarour said: 'His body was like a collander. I counted 15 bullet wounds of different calibres and there could have been more. Three bullets were fired directly at his nose. His right knee had been smashed to pieces. I think it was with a rock because the injuries looked as if there had been a grinding effect. Also his trousers were shredded around the knee and there were bits of grass on his skin and in his flesh.'

His left arm had been cut twice with a knife and there were what looked like dog bites on his arm and around his testicles. 'I do not have the expertise to say if the wounds were administered before or after he was shot,' he said.

The army spokesman said Atawi approached soldiers with a handgun. 'They fired before he could shoot them. The gun was later found to be loaded.' He denied Atawi had the injuries the doctor alleges.

The high number of deaths in Nablus over Christmas and their brutal nature have largely been ignored by human rights groups and the media because Nablus is isolated, but slowly people are beginning to pay attention.

Noam Hossfatter, a spokesman for B'tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said they were examining Qassas' death with a view to pressing the army to investigate: 'At the moment there is no eyewitness, so we cannot yet say there was an execution but if someone was in custody and was then found dead it would suggest something very unusual took place.'

Bassem Eid, director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, said his organisation's lawyer was expected to write to the Israeli military attorney-general asking him to investigate.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: munozjoe
Israel is a law breaker, and the palestinians respect human rights and international law. {sarcasm).
21 posted on 02/01/2004 12:41:41 PM PST by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I agree with you.
22 posted on 02/01/2004 12:43:18 PM PST by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: munozjoe
The Palestinain starting point is "Drive the Jews into the Sea". This has not changed in 55 years. In every Palestinian text book the maps of the middle East leave out Israel. They teach hatred in their schools from k through 12 and into the Universities in contravention of the Oslo agreement.
The Palis refuse to agree that Israel has the right to exist. Therefore, there can be no peace until there is a fundimental change by the the Palestinians. Until then they have elected murder and deserve death!!!
They will change when enough of them die.
25 posted on 02/01/2004 1:55:31 PM PST by ozdragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
Palestinian human rights group

That's a laugh.

26 posted on 02/01/2004 1:56:09 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
we're so hypersensitive that some democrat will get through the barbed wire, every new person goes through this crap. Hang in there and welcome.
27 posted on 02/01/2004 2:02:03 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gedeon3
Palestinians deserve no rights until they act like Humans.
The Palestinians have rejected every attempt by the Israelis to make peace.
28 posted on 02/01/2004 2:04:44 PM PST by ozdragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
People here in Berlin are not stupid enough to trade less because of anything that happens in Israel. They do not blame the US for what Sharon does and altogether they do no criticize Israel very much because they think Israel is a touchy topic for them. But they do their best, e.g. they just helped to negotiate this exchange of prisoners. I like what the German friends do.

About retaliation you have to admit that the Sharon government used it frequently. One result was that Palestinians could present photos of killed babies to the Arab press when they tried to kill someone in a crowded street from a helicopter.

I do not say Israel has no right to fight back. But the violence with which they fought has provoked criticism in large parts of the world. Even in the Israeli army. Many soldiers refuse to do their service in the occupied zones.
29 posted on 02/01/2004 2:24:06 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Nonsense. The UN gave us full support when we went after Bin Laden in Afghanistan and Arabs who were not already lunatics could understand it. Syria gave in, Pakistan did, Uzbekistan did, Tajikistan did, Egypt did, Indonesia did, Malaysia did.
Canada fought with us, the Germans are still helping us a lot over there.
When it is just obvious you are right no reasonable person denies you the right of defense.
The demonstrations in the Arab world started when a war to Iraq was declared against the will of the United Nations, backed with proofs weapons inspectors called "not authentic". The documents presented to prove the uranium deal in Africa was a forgery and the UN inspectors said it was so obvious that the US should have known. Now imagine how you read that story in the Arab papers...
We have the means to have the best intelligence so we should use it. Next time we need to defend our country we need to make the case bullet-proof, than we can convince and have no problem.
30 posted on 02/01/2004 2:31:35 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: montag813
The difference between an Arab adult and an Arab child is the difference between a missile in flight and a missile about to be fired. I am sorry, but that is stupid racism. In many countries Arabs, Christians and Jews live peacefully together.
31 posted on 02/01/2004 2:35:44 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gedeon3
Do not generalize. Neither do the majority of Palestinians bomb themselves in Israeli Cafes nor do all Israelis support the wall or the retaliation strategy.
32 posted on 02/01/2004 2:39:51 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rhys Ifans
If you have anything intelligent to add please do so. If you just want to insult people that says more about you than about the others.
I am no leftist. Doing business in Berlin I can see where that leads. People in Eastern Europe still have to go a long way for economic recovery.
33 posted on 02/01/2004 2:43:40 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ozdragon
People like you only cause hatred and change nothing. Without a peace agreement and two separate states there will never be peace. Many on both sides agree, it is just a minority of radicals who don't.
34 posted on 02/01/2004 2:50:20 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
About retaliation you have to admit that the Sharon government used it frequently. One result was that Palestinians could present photos of killed babies to the Arab press when they tried to kill someone in a crowded street from a helicopter.

There was a bus bombing in Jerusalem last week. 10 Israelis were killed. 20 are still in the hospital. Please tell me what retaliation Israel has taken for this bombing

35 posted on 02/01/2004 3:12:02 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
People like you only cause hatred and change nothing. Without a peace agreement and two separate states there will never be peace.

Dream on. Is that what you supercilious twits in Europe really believe? That the Paleostinian Jihad and Jew killing will end once they get a state? Would you bet your house on this proposition?

How dumb is that?

36 posted on 02/01/2004 3:14:58 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Stop insulting others, try to argument. I am not a twit from Europe and yes I believe without a peace treaty violence will never stop. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis share that view.
37 posted on 02/01/2004 3:19:52 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The Sharon government used that strategy frequently. If they do not use it this time they may have learned. If so, I hope they do not forget it.
38 posted on 02/01/2004 3:21:23 PM PST by munozjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
If they do not use it this time they may have learned. If so, I hope they do not forget it.

So Israel should no nothing in retaliation for the suicide bomber who blew up a bus killing 10 Israelis and crippling many others. The Arabs should get a free pass on this because if Israel retaliates it only continues the cycle of violence. What Israel needs is a Mahatma Gandhi peacenik leader to make peace with the Arabs. That if only those darn stubborn Jews would give up Gaza and West Bank there would be peace today with your Paleostinians.

39 posted on 02/01/2004 3:41:03 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: munozjoe
I am not a twit from Europe .....

Are you American or European?
40 posted on 02/01/2004 3:41:49 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson