Replies

Exactly!

This is exactly why this guy's statement, "what if the government was building pro-wrestling arenas and shutting down competing sports? Would we still feel so confident the public's choice was 'free'? And what if the government did the same thing to create a political advantage for one party?"

The analogy is that it's the Bush admin that is building right-wing radio to support him. We all know that's a lie, but the dims have to try to make people think they ARE BEING KEPT FROM SPEAKING.

However, the Constitution only guarantees the RIGHT TO SPEAK, it does not guarantee THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD. The dims just don't get it .. their message is getting out but the public is just not buying it.

A good example is the Kerry campaign. You would think from the hoopla the media is drumming up and the Newsweak polls which show Kerry ahead of Bush, that Kerry is set to win the WH.

However, according to people within the Bush campaign, Kerry was at 36% last October, and he's at 36% now; Kerry has had no movement in the polls. Kerry's message is not being received as valid, except by a few primary voters. Why .. because Kerry says stuff like "Nixon's war" .. when anybody with even half a brain knows it was Johnson's war. And .. when asked about botox, he pretended he had never heard of the word.

If the media thinks this will be a cakewalk, I beg to differ. Kerry's voting record ALONE is a nightmare for any candidate wanting to appear centrist.