Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phsstpok
What they should be doing with arty is not gutting it, but upgrading it. In range and in smart, guided firepower to boost fire effectiveness, and in sensor and information systems to boost situational awareness and cut response times. That means terminal IR homing for 155 rounds (an improvement over copperhead). MIRV style terminal homing for MLRS bomblets. Yes by all means smart mortars too. It means good counterbattery radars to spot every mortar the instant it fires and put steel on it right back. It means real time own force position displays on VR maps inside every battalion fire direction center.

What will you get in response? You will get on call fire timed in seconds not hours, exactly where you want it, powerful enough to neutralize any target you care to name. Then the light guys up front will have some real combat ability - as forward observors, not as a terror to snakes. They won't have to wait hours for it to come in, and it'll have infinite "loiter time". It will kill stuff as fast as you can see it and phone home, and as fast as completely unsexy trucks can haul the ammo up to the guns.

Why are we in this mess? It is clear the present revolution in military affairs is all about smart weapon firepower. Firepower has increased in importance drastically. And range. Instead of doctrine running with this, outside the airforce it is all razzle dazzle maneuver warfare theory instead. That is the real hidebound idea - it is so 1940.

A big part of the reason why is that the important arms for it are the least sexy in the force. Why are they unsexy? Because sexy is synonymous with needs lots of courage, and it doesn't take a lot of courage to feed a gun or truck it ammo. It works just fine. But because it works so well it doesn't really even involve serious risk to life and limb, military culture turns up its nose at it. It is geeky. No snakes are eaten. At least in the air force, the officers go off to fight in risky ways. Arty is a bureaucracy by comparison. Move guns into position, set up guns, process fire support requests, feed guns, enemy evaporates. Not sexy. Just extremely effective death-dealing.

64 posted on 02/01/2004 12:10:29 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: JasonC
I don't think sexiness and snake eater contempt for gun bunnies is as much an issue as the cold hard fact that the Marines can do most of the Army's job, and they already have a ride to the war. Read Transforming Strategic Mobility.

The Army is completely dependent on the Navy and Air Force (including the Civil Reserve Air Fleet) to project its forces into the fray.

66 posted on 02/01/2004 1:32:43 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson