Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
On the basis of what authority should federally appointed judges be outlawing abortions?
2 posted on 01/31/2004 8:28:41 PM PST by Huck (Hold on to your wallet--the President's awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
The Patriot Act is more nuanced that strongly for or strongly against. Kerry, who for all I know voted for the thing, says he wants to take out some provisions. I heard him mention the infamous "sneak and peek" provisions. I don't remember the details, but I recall looking at that subject and I think I wanted sneak and peek out, too. I wonder what the President's position on that is. I don't have to wonder what Ashcroft's position is.
4 posted on 01/31/2004 8:31:53 PM PST by Huck (Hold on to your wallet--the President's awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
They don't have the authority.... abortion is a purely state matter and it should be sent back to the state legislatures.
7 posted on 01/31/2004 8:34:13 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Constitutionally, abortions are none of the court's business. They inserted themselves into it with Roe v. Wade. The congress should write the laws (actually the state legislatures should write the laws). Your statement makes no sense, as the judges currently are overturning laws passed by the elected representatives. Bush wishes to appoint judges that will recognize the constitutional limits on their authority.
26 posted on 01/31/2004 9:14:00 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson