Who's "rules?" And where for that matter did I call anyone a Nazi? One cannot simply slap a knee-jerk prohibition on illustrations that blow away a position simply because the illustration mentions Nazis and remain credible in the argument. You mistakenly think by whining about it that you've won some illusory point in an argument. All you've really done is attempted to stifle speech with which you disagree, because you simply have no credible counter-point.
While that may be your own "little" personal third rail of posting credibility, it is hardly so for anyone else. You might want to brush off your 6th grade English texts and learn how and when nouns are used as subjects. Concenrate particularly on parts of speech known as appositives. Failing that, we'll all be content with the knowledge that you do not read with much ability to comprehend, and will attempt to shut down debate in which your positions are fast losing ground with phoney "rules" that you simply make up and mistakenly think any (non-existant) defining consensus on FR cares anyway.