[prairiebreeze]

One person's observations are another's insults I suppose. No where did I name names, call names or say anything other than my observation and opinions of the maturity levels of those arm-chair critics on FR who are all so eager to jump on any topic that seems to fit their "Bush is doing a poor job and needs to be taught a lesson" agenda. But show no concept of the time needed to effect positive and lasting change in this country.

They are my observations about the motives and stages of Bush Bashers. Did you feel insulted? Why?

Prairie

[sauropod]

"They demonstrate impatience and a juvenile need for immediate gratification. Their grasp of long-term committment is practicaly non-existent. It's time for adults to be adults and understand the need for patience, grit and stick-to-it-iveness. That's the way we rebuid America."

What do you call that if not an insult?

Let me finish my response to you in this way:

Theodore Roosevelt, said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or anyone else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

[sauropod]

I guess it comes down to talking about "maturity level."

I don't think i really need to spell this out any further... Your post was insulting.