To: softengine
The author says that not voting for Bush is a vote for one of his opponents. That would bother me if not for the fact that there is nary a difference between Bush and his opponents. While I dread the possibility of a President Edwards or a President Kerry, America literally can't afford another four years of Bush's "compassionate conservatism."
25 posted on
01/31/2004 7:15:21 PM PST by
Holden Magroin
(Like father, like son.)
To: Holden Magroin
"While I dread the possibility of a President Edwards or a President Kerry, America literally can't afford another four years of Bush's "compassionate conservatism."
Then vote for Bush just so Michael Moore and Democrats every where will have to suffer through four more years of Bush. Think of how it will stick in their craw to have Bush as President again. Don't you love the idea of Barbara Streisand being misearable? Don't you love the thought of the liberal elite suffering mental anguish over losing to Bush?
To: Holden Magroin
**That would bother me if not for the fact that there is nary a difference between Bush and his opponents.**
What??? I think there must be a point here somewhere but darned if I know what it is.
88 posted on
01/31/2004 8:30:20 PM PST by
ilovew
(I love my cowboy president!)
To: Holden Magroin
Holden you are sooooo wrong. "nary a difference between Bush and his opponents"
Kerry, Clark, Edwards,Dean, Lieberman--liberal causes promoted with gay marriages, no God in schools or games, litmus test for judges, prochoice as much as the day of delivery for Clark. Dean worked at Planned Parenthood as a doctor. All promise to increase taxes and all (except Lieberman) soft on defense. All would ask the UN for permission to defend ourselves. Some think that courting Arafat, Castro is the way to go.
No sir, the Bush that I know is not at all like these guys.
105 posted on
01/31/2004 8:47:07 PM PST by
olliemb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson