I did plan on attending CPAC next year at the urgence of Dio...But if attending CPAC makes one think they are entitled to "insult the intelligence" of those on FR who support Bush....I want no part of it.
I find that "Bushbot" is a term often used by the males on FR when any woman posts something that doesn't match their line of thinking.....
This originated as a Pro Bush thread and was immediately attacked by the anti's It has nothing to do with a legitimate discussion....It's the same mantra again and again and again.....It's all Bush's fault.
Let's be realistic. Bush has inherited a lot of (what was the term you used for cow dung?) It is a formidable job. I know of no one who is running or who has a chance of being elected that could do a better job. The naysayers are working against him. (If they truly wanted him to change they'd be on the phone and writing letters letting the GOOP and Bush know their thoughts; not whining on FR. Complaining for complaining sake accomplishes nothing!
I have insulted nobody's intelligence. I have pointed out what is.
"I find that "Bushbot" is a term often used by the males on FR when any woman posts something that doesn't match their line of thinking....."
Why the sexism?
"(If they truly wanted him to change they'd be on the phone and writing letters letting the GOOP and Bush know their thoughts; not whining on FR. Complaining for complaining sake accomplishes nothing!"
What the hell do you think CPAC is?
And while you're at it, explain to me why Ed Gillespie (head of the RNC) took no questions after his speech there?