Maybe Bush is Right On

Intellectual Conservative ^ | 30 January 2004 | Raymond Green

[NYC GOP Chick]

Hey! The rumpkissing was directed toward her, not you! ;)

[hoosiermama]

I'm sure she meant "OH GREAT ONE" as an honor not an invalidation....Only the Bushbots attack and insult people.

OTOH she has been trying to explain that she really didn't mean what she said she meant when she didn't mean it......

Chicago Lady I finally figured out what you were trying to say, but you were not communicating very well....

The term "the worse of two evils" is the problem it means different things in different parts of the country....For example how do you pronounce The word dead....To some of us it's dead, to others if deaduh and to others its dayuuduh. Depend on where you're from!

[gatorbait]

Unfortunately, the rules set in place MANY moons back virtually assure the scenario Da Podman sets. I am none too thrilled with the Medicare thing , eitherbut having looked at the Dems' "idea" and their continuous screeching, I'd say it is mild. My hope,Kit and pod, is that our congressional types get off their hams, and do their duty(Damn, what a thought! ) Anyway,the Medicare thing has to be adressed and now, it appears to be . I think the 33% increase was known and timed to appear now .I also think that the House Republicans knew it too(Think Tom DeLay) Kind of a warm ,fuzzy feeling knowing the Hammer will be the guiding light .

[gatorbait]

This rumpkissing has GOT TO STOP!!!

She can anytime she wants...hush!

[NYC GOP Chick]

Dream on...

[hoosiermama]

GUtzuntite (or however you spell it) How about God bless you!

[NYC GOP Chick]

Either is fine, thank you. :)

[gatorbait]

Dream on...

I never said it wouldn't be mutual

[chicagolady]

If a person wants to interpret

The lesser of 2 evils is evil still....

Meaning Bush is evil, that is a persons perogative.
Thank God it's a Free Republic.
____________________________________________________________
Maybe Bush is Right On

Posted by chicagolady to Tamsey
On News/Activism 02/01/2004 4:08:15 PM CST #368 of 407

I do not believe on supporting Bush on issues I do not agree with him on!

It is more of an "Issue Statement" Not a Bush statement.

---

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies

Maybe Bush is Right On

Posted by Tamsey to chicagolady
On News/Activism 02/01/2004 4:04:32 PM CST #366 of 407

I am not calling Bush evil. That is what you read into a simple statement!

You're simple statement was pretty clear... you said the lesser of two evils was evil still.

What did you mean then?

____________________________________________________________


What part of It is Not a Bush statement don't folks understand.

It is not a Bush Statement.
It is not a Bush Statement.
It is not a Bush Statement.

[NYC GOP Chick]

LOL!

[hoosiermama]

"It is not a Bush statement but an issues statement":

IOW. When Bush has a policy that I do not like I can choose it or be left with the liberal alternative..... The third possibility, which I would prefer is not available therefore I'm left with chosing between two possibilities that are not to my liking.


Is this what you meant?

[Tamzee]

Twilight Zone music cued...

Imagine if you will... a thread on Free Republic where right-wingers weren't proposing that we put Kerry in the White House on purpose.

;-)

[hoosiermama]

Had an interesting discussion today with two eighty year olds.....The both think that whomever is currently at the top of the "D" candidate list will be open for attack...That by the convention no candidate will have enough votes on the first ballot for confirmation. A floor fight will ensue. Then HRC will be nominated to save the day and unite the party......

Wonder how people will vote then?

[sauropod]

Oh man! I will be driving my friends and neighbors to the polls! Beating them like a rented mule.

Just say NO to Her Heinous.

[hoosiermama]

Do you really think Kerry is any better? I think he's worse.

[hoosiermama]

ThTo: honeygrl
"Bush needs to move back over to the right a little if I'm going to be motivated to vote for him."
Any person claiming to be conservative who is not motivated to keep the Democrats out of power after knowing EXACTLY what they will do with it if given the opportunity, has a real problem with reality. They're either political martyrs, have not been paying attention to what the Democrat candidates have been promising they will do if elected, or are ignoring (or are totally or willfully ignorant of) the history of the last seventy years, or are incredibly dense or insane, or have a morbid desire to toil their lives away in the misery of a Liberal Hell! Any person who would support a third party candidate who has absolutely zero chance of winning even one state or even a single electoral vote is so politically naive and devoid of the brainpower that The Creator so graciously endowed upon them, that it's not even worth wasting pixels on.

And I can tell you, that I probably won't be wasting very many more pixels on people who are coming to FR to trash and bash our candidates and or to trash and bash and drive away the very posters I'm trying to attract. If the intent of third party supporters is to cause as much hell and discontent on our forum and to inflict as much damage to FR as they possibly can, well, I can assure you we will have many fewer third party posters left on FR very soon. The LePur colony can have them. Thank you very much.

It might be different if there was a primary involved. These kind of battles need to take place as part of the process of selecting the best person to run. In this case, there will be no primary. God willing and barring any major disasters, George W. Bush will be the candidate. So it will either be Bush or one of the Democrats that gets elected. No one else stands a snowball's chance in hell. And I've given every person on this web site plenty of advance notice (I've been saying it for the last three years) that FR will NOT be used to help replace Bush with a Democrat. Period. End of story.

Again, if that is your intent, leave now or get yourself banned later. Excessive and repetitive attacks on our candidates or our posters will not be tolerated. Try your luck at DUh or LibertyPost. In presidential politics, they are interchangeable.


712 posted on 02/01/2004 6:55:33 PM EST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Repliesought everyone should read this:

[Tamzee]

Then HRC will be nominated to save the day and unite the party......

Now that would make people get off their prissy too-pure-for-Bush duffs and VOTE :-)

[kitkat]

*** 

;-)

Let's just say the answer would take a long time to discuss and would involve complete reform of the health care industry.***

Okay by me, S.P. Enjoyed talking to you.

---

[sauropod]

De nada.

[sauropod]

Kerry is not totalitarian in the same sense as Her Shrewness.

She is utterly ruthless. BTW, a new book on her is coming out by R. Emmett Tyrrell. Its called "Madam Hillary" and if his stint at writing Boy Clinton was any clue, it should be a humdinger!