Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockpile

39 posted on 01/31/2004 5:05:45 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Cannoneer No. 4
Hey thanks for the photos. Never saw them myself but heard about their use. Were these APCs that were damaged somehow and unable to be deployed normally?

Also heard of using Ontos with canister rounds as ambush breakers in convoys. I climbed into one at Camp Lejeune, it was pretty small. Might could almost put two of them on a lowboy.

As far as the M 85s go, they seemed to have a lot of feed trouble. The M2s in the M48s seemed to be more reliable from what I recall. Also, the M85 sights in our turrets seemed to mess up a lot; maybe they weren't saltwater proofed enough.

47 posted on 01/31/2004 6:05:14 PM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Latest I've heard from Knox: the Stryker's General Dynamics promoters have a cure for the vehicle's unsuitability for use with the Mk 19 grenade launcher: do away with the Mark 19, and switch over to a *new and improved model* Mark 47 40mm auto grenade launcher instead.

Coincidentally, of course, the builder for the Mark 47 is General Dynamics.

It may be that the Stryker's incompatability with the Mark 19 was designed in from the get-go.

-archy-/-

57 posted on 01/31/2004 6:55:16 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson