Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
Army passes on Textron contract

IMHO, the ASV is a superior vehicle to the M1114 in nearly every application I can think of.

I wonder if we have any Freepers who have experience with both vehicles?

26 posted on 01/31/2004 2:32:31 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Cannoneer No. 4
IMHO, the ASV is a superior vehicle to the M1114 in nearly every application I can think of.

I'm not sure about its ability to be sling-loaded and transported via UH60 Blackhawk. I know that's possible with a Tow Hummer if the ammunition load and crew is carried in a second helo, though likely not with an armored Humvee version.

And unlike the now slat-armored, 23-ton Strykers, the ASVs can indeed be transported, with crews and at least some ammo load, aboard USAF C130s. If a lightly armored, well-armed reaction force is called for in Iraq, capable of being moved to a hotspot and landed on a nearby airfield or quarter-mile stretch of straight highway, there are two vehicles very suitable for the task: ASVs and M113A3s

29 posted on 01/31/2004 3:36:32 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson