Replies

>
If you vote against Bush or stay home, you vote to kill unborn babies. Go look in the mirror the next day, if you can.

I won't have any difficulty. Why? Because there is no indication that GWB will make a fight to get a conservative on the Supreme Court. The dems have proven they can stop any nomination they want. GWB will submit another O'Conner (sp?) type.

>

This is not a matter you are allowed in *consistency* to reverse. Having no evidence does not trump having evidence of the converse. You *know* the Dem candidate will nominate a stealthy pro Choice nominee. The extremists have said they *know* the gutless GOP Senate will not obstruct the stealthy pro Choice nominee. You therefore *know* that taking action or inaction against Bush is done with the explicit intent of killing unborn babies. This is iron hard and concrete. It is uncontrovertible.

You rebut it by trying to lean on an absence of evidence you will get what you prefer. That is not an equal reality. Uncertainty of positive is always preferable to certainty of negative.

If you are an extremist, you will NEVER get to vote FOR anyone in a general election. The political spectrum forces this. Not the GOP. Not me. Not you. It is universal, timeless truth. You will NEVER get to vote FOR anyone. All you will ever get to do is vote AGAINST the least preferred option. You will hate every minute of it, forever. That is what timeless truths are about.

WF Buckley already thought all this through. We won't out think him on this matter.

I support the rightward most candidate who is viable.

Let's see..."You therefore *know* that taking action or inaction against Bush is done with the explicit intent of killing unborn babies. This is iron hard and concrete. It is uncontrovertible."...and you call ME an extremist?

Sorry - but I think a person can oppose GWB and not contribute to the death of a single child. We obviously disagree - but you have NO RIGHT to say my opposition is done with "the explicit intent of killing unborn babies".

If you are an extremist, you will NEVER get to vote FOR anyone in a general election.

Actually, the extremists on the other side do get to vote "FOR" someone (note the tiny vote that Nader finally got). Why? because they know that even a "centrist" Democrat will move the country incrementally in their direction.

Now limited government types like me (and I am no more "extremist" than was the 1994 GOP platform) really do "NEVER" get a vote, because a "centrist" Republican such as GWB will acquiesce in every incremental move to the left.

I am voting for my local GOP congressman who voted against CFR. I will vote third party in the Presidential election.