Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HankReardon
Yeah, I agree, you see, in hindsight I'm wiser now. Do you really think when your father voted for Perot he did not want him to win, he just wanted to "send a message"? Conservatives voting for a 3rd party candidate brough death and destruction to America.

I don't think he had thought it through to that point.

BTW, I do not agree w/ your last sentence. That leaves no room for adhering to principles. That leaves us no better than them.

184 posted on 02/01/2004 6:01:14 AM PST by sauropod (Better to have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod
What's there not to agree with? The Clinton presidency brought politicization the intelligence agencies, would not allow info to be gathered from criminally associated sources, they did not take the terrorist threat as seriously as they should have, treated attacks as a criminal acts that needed to be addressed as such. Death and destruction, the attacks of 9-11 happened to America because Clinton was President. Clinton was President because many of us voted for the 3rd party candidate, Perot.
186 posted on 02/01/2004 6:07:57 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson