Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jscd3
The Roman Catholic Church did abandon the requirement of celibecy for about 100 years (10th or 11th century, I can't remember which off the top of my head)

You sure about that?

Look here: www.christendom-awake.org/pages/mcgovern/celhist1 for a pretty lengthy and erudite review of the history.

22 posted on 01/31/2004 7:27:00 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ninenot
You sure about that?

Yeah, pretty certain. It wasn't that the Church ever said that celibecy wasn't the best or correct thing (in fact, it was real consistent about that); rather I think that the social upheavels associated with the 10th century were so great that the Church was faced with a problem of significant numbers (though nothing near a majority) of priests and bishops who were taking wives. Rather than declare them all heretics or defrock them, there was a recognition that they were still valid priests (although I think that their children were barred from ever entering Holy Orders).

Celibecy continued to be considered the ideal though, and by about 1050 or 1100 (I think) the Church was able to reestablish the discipline as a requirement. I'll do a check on the exact time frame later when I have some time

35 posted on 01/31/2004 7:51:38 AM PST by jscd3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson