Replies

just what do you stand for? Bush handling the illegals has so far been exactly what the Democrats would do. His attorney general has shown the same lack of concern with application of the law as Janet Reno on most issues (note: most, he isn't QUITE as bad). Rumsfeld has consistently attacked the Army and acted like he's too good to be advised by people who actually know how to run the Army. Powell is a flaming lefty on most domestic issues. I am informed, that's why I look at Bush and think that either way we're going to collectively get screwed as a nation. The man is an enabler on domestic spending. He has not vetoed a single bill yet and that has sent a message to every spender in his party: if you pass it'll sign it, no matter what. You can stick your head in the sand all you want, but barring Edwards or Clark winning the nomination I'll vote for a Constitution Party candidate. I want my vote to remind that prick Rove that the Conservative and Right-Libertarian vote does get out and go to parties that reflect instead of sitting at home and crying to mama.

You are wrong IMNO & the opinion of the majority of posters at FRee REpublic.. You are "new" enough to NOT know what Miss Marple stands for ... nor do you care that this is NOT a forum to push Right-Libertarian mentality.

In case you didn't realize it, the military is under CIVILIAN control. Carping by generals who always want things done their way (see Wesley Clark) is the norm. Powell has done a pretty good job on the diplomacy front (as in his dealings with North Korea and speeches before the UN). To say Ashcroft is only a little bit better than Reno is the indicator to me that you are a fringer who is so far out of mainstream thought that I probably shouldn't answer you.