To: goldstategop
I'm at the point where I believe gridlock would be a better mode of governance.
13 posted on
01/31/2004 5:09:03 AM PST by
Glenn
(MS:Where do you want to go today? OSX:Where do you want to go tomorrow?Linux:Are you coming or what?)
To: Glenn
Agreed, it is better when they do absolutely nothing than this insanity. I would prefer to pay them their salary and let them never come to washington other than for a dinner or something. The more they do, the worse it gets.
18 posted on
01/31/2004 5:12:26 AM PST by
chris1
To: Glenn
That is not the first time I have heard someone say this.
21 posted on
01/31/2004 5:14:59 AM PST by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: Glenn
Ah, yes, gridlock. That is the latest thing I have heard pushed by our friends in the press this morning.
As far as the "well-placed Bush operative" anonymously quoted in his arrogant statement, I will bet 10 bucks it was Bill Kristol, who is indeed, arrogant, but not an operative.
I really think peoole should pay more attention to the attempt to divide us. While disagreeing with policy is fine (and I am personally opposed to some of the President's policies, particularly the education bill) it seems to me that there is a concerted effort to fan the flames of dissension, rather than simply disagreeing.
To: Glenn
***I'm at the point where I believe gridlock would be a better mode of governance.***
There is ALWAYS gridlock. Even with a Republican House, Senate and White House, there is gridlock. The Republicans have to satisfy the voters back home. Can you say PORK? Can you say SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS?
With the Dems in control of Congress, it will be impossible to save this country from socialism. Do you want Hillary Care?
229 posted on
01/31/2004 9:17:59 AM PST by
kitkat
(Purr, purr SNOOZE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson