1 posted on
01/31/2004 3:04:05 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Heresy or Schism .... pick heresy he says, everytime. Sheesh. Thanks for this post kattracks...for it's a direct illumination of the undergarments beneath the robes of these renegade bishops.
Let's translate: a "church" is more important that the collective beliefs of its members. If beliefs must be sacrificed, oh well, Christ would approve.
(Jim Jones and David Koresh may be extreme examples of this logic, but only in the minds of a schismatic, right?)
There is a word for this outlook on the church, and it begins with the letter "i". Anyone? Anyone?
2 posted on
01/31/2004 3:51:25 AM PST by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
To: kattracks
"If you must make a choice between heresy and schism, always choose heresy," said the Rt. Rev. Peter J. Lee "because schism is far too expensive".
To: kattracks
Choose tofollow the word of God and you will not have these problems.
4 posted on
01/31/2004 3:58:59 AM PST by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: kattracks
Boy have times changed. Luther would have found this amusing.
A faith that allows heresy is not religious but a social group.
7 posted on
01/31/2004 4:01:35 AM PST by
KeyWest
To: kattracks
"If you must make a choice between heresy and schism, always choose heresy," said the Rt. Rev. Peter J. Lee to 500 Episcopalians meeting for the annual diocesan council at the Hyatt Regency in Reston. Ummm . . . but isn't he a Bishop of a Church that began precisely because it's founder, Henry VIII of England, chose "schism" over "heresy"?
Actually, wait a minute. Henry VIII chose schism not over "heresy" but for reasons rather less weighty (and rather more personal) than "heresy," did he not?
In any event, this Bishop is a Protestant, and wan't the whole point of the Reformation that "schism" is far preferable to putative "heresy?" What did Martin Luther mean when he hurled his "here I stand" challenge to Rome, if not exactly that he'd prefer to split the Church than to tolerate what he believed was heresy?
Clearly, men like this Bishop men stand for naught but the power and privileges conferred by their office. Since that's all they stand for, history would indicate that the Good Lord will take away their office in His own good time.
Sounds eerily like the lavender American clergy of my own RCC, now that I mention it.
To: ahadams2; seamole
Sigh...
To: kattracks
22 posted on
01/31/2004 8:17:42 AM PST by
ahadams2
(Anglican Freeper Resource Page: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican/)
To: kattracks
"As a schismatic, you have torn and divided the body of Christ. Choose heresy every time." Secular humanist crap!
People who remain in Robinson's "church" risk the fire of hell!
28 posted on
01/31/2004 10:41:34 AM PST by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson