Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/31/2004 3:04:05 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Heresy or Schism .... pick heresy he says, everytime. Sheesh. Thanks for this post kattracks...for it's a direct illumination of the undergarments beneath the robes of these renegade bishops.

Let's translate: a "church" is more important that the collective beliefs of its members. If beliefs must be sacrificed, oh well, Christ would approve.

(Jim Jones and David Koresh may be extreme examples of this logic, but only in the minds of a schismatic, right?)

There is a word for this outlook on the church, and it begins with the letter "i". Anyone? Anyone?
2 posted on 01/31/2004 3:51:25 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"If you must make a choice between heresy and schism, always choose heresy," said the Rt. Rev. Peter J. Lee "because schism is far too expensive".
3 posted on 01/31/2004 3:56:25 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Choose tofollow the word of God and you will not have these problems.
4 posted on 01/31/2004 3:58:59 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Boy have times changed. Luther would have found this amusing.

A faith that allows heresy is not religious but a social group.
7 posted on 01/31/2004 4:01:35 AM PST by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"If you must make a choice between heresy and schism, always choose heresy," said the Rt. Rev. Peter J. Lee to 500 Episcopalians meeting for the annual diocesan council at the Hyatt Regency in Reston.

Ummm . . . but isn't he a Bishop of a Church that began precisely because it's founder, Henry VIII of England, chose "schism" over "heresy"?

Actually, wait a minute. Henry VIII chose schism not over "heresy" but for reasons rather less weighty (and rather more personal) than "heresy," did he not?

In any event, this Bishop is a Protestant, and wan't the whole point of the Reformation that "schism" is far preferable to putative "heresy?" What did Martin Luther mean when he hurled his "here I stand" challenge to Rome, if not exactly that he'd prefer to split the Church than to tolerate what he believed was heresy?

Clearly, men like this Bishop men stand for naught but the power and privileges conferred by their office. Since that's all they stand for, history would indicate that the Good Lord will take away their office in His own good time.

Sounds eerily like the lavender American clergy of my own RCC, now that I mention it.

10 posted on 01/31/2004 4:29:32 AM PST by Heartbreak of Psoriasis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ahadams2; seamole
Sigh...
19 posted on 01/31/2004 5:11:44 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
whoops - also posted at

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1068998/posts

22 posted on 01/31/2004 8:17:42 AM PST by ahadams2 (Anglican Freeper Resource Page: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"As a schismatic, you have torn and divided the body of Christ. Choose heresy every time."

Secular humanist crap!

People who remain in Robinson's "church" risk the fire of hell!

28 posted on 01/31/2004 10:41:34 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson