To: Patriot1998
To be fair to Clinton, he has stood by Bush's decision to go to war (he hasn't made a bunch of [expletive] remarks about how Bush failed to find WMD)--unlike some of the other people who were "tough" on Saddam when that meant not going to war.
5 posted on
01/30/2004 9:45:33 PM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: xm177e2
To be fair to Clinton I hate being fair to Clinton. It gives me a rash.
To: xm177e2
Good grief, Clinton did everything he could to undermine this President and his handling of our response to 9/11. the ONLY reason why Clinton never condemned this President for attacking Saddam is because he is smarter than that Botox intoxicated loser John Kerry. Clinton knows everyone remembers his public statements and his half measures of launching hundreds of Cruise Missiles around the globe when ever he needed to divert attention from what ever corrupt campaign fund raising scandals he was involved in, or his countless unsavory liaison's he had with the assorted interns and Bimbo's in the Oval Office.
Bill Clinton has been trying to excuse his lack of response to the many attacks we suffered under his watch by saying that he would have done just as George W. Bush has if 9/11 happened on his watch, as he tries to tell us that Osama bin Laden was on his mind every day, and he did everything he could to bring him to justice.
Clinton's style of leading was to Poll the American people on where they wanted go, so he could lead them. WJC is a fraud
13 posted on
01/30/2004 11:22:09 PM PST by
MJY1288
(WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
To: xm177e2
To be fair to Clinton.You should be banned. I'm pushing the abuse button.
LOL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson