Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Seeks $16.2 Billion; Cuts Shuttle, Station, Next Generation Launch Tech Programs
Yahoo ^ | Fri, Jan 30, 2004 | Brian Berger

Posted on 01/30/2004 7:08:18 PM PST by demlosers

U.S. President George W. Bush (news - web sites) is requesting $16.2 billion for NASA (news - web sites) in 2005, including $1.09 billion designated for the new organization being created to carry out the president's new vision for space exploration, according to NASA budget documents obtained by Space News.

The money in the budget of the new exploration enterprise, as it is known at NASA, is not for all new programs, but includes funding for existing programs that will now fall under the new exploration bureaucracy. It includes $483 million for Project Prometheus, the nuclear power and propulsion program started in 2003 and $428 million for Project Constellation, the new name for the proposed Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). While the CEV is a new program, it replaces a similar effort known as the Orbital Space Plane.

Bush's request includes a five-year projection that calls for annual budget increases at NASA each year until the agency's budget levels off at about $18 billion a year starting in 2009.

When Bush announced Jan. 14 that NASA's new goal was to prepare for a return to the moon and an eventual mission to Mars, he pledged that the bulk of the money needed to start that effort would come from $11.6 billion that would be shifted over the next five years from other NASA programs. The five-year plan outlined in Bush's 2005 budget request details exactly where that money would come from:

$5.9 billion by phasing out or transferring to the new effort funding previously set aside for existing launch programs such as the Orbital Space Plane and the Next Generation Launch Technology program, an effort to develop reusable launch vehicle technology; $1.5 billion from the shuttle program; $1.2 billion by eliminating research aboard the international space station that is not tied to the president's new exploration vision; $2.7 billion by deferring the start of several planned new missions, including the Global Precipitation Measuring Mission, solar terrestrial probes and Beyond Einstein, a group of planned astronomy missions designed to investigate the origin and nature of phenomena like dark matter and black holes. In addition, spending on several Earth Science missions and Sun-Earth Connection missions will be held flat through 2009; and $300 million from reducing space technology development and deferring institutional activities such as the construction of new facilities at NASA field centers.

The budget request also outlines a number of other changes in major agency programs.

The Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter, which had been planned for a launch in 2011 or 2012 will slip a couple of years to about 2015, according to a NASA chart that accompanies the budget request.

The space shuttle and international space station would get $4.3 billion in 2005, including $200 million for dedicated return-to-flight activities. NASA plans to spend $680 million through 2007 on space shuttle changes in the wake of the Columbia accident.

The space station budget request also includes $10 million in new funding for "a flight demonstration initiative to pursue launch services with emerging launch systems." Industry and government sources said that money is earmarked for start-up firms such as Kistler Aerospace and Space Exploration Technologies.The budget also includes $70 million in funding for robotic lunar missions. According to budget documents, NASA plans to spend $420 million through 2009 on lunar exploration missions.

NASA plans to launch a robotic lunar orbiter in 2008 and a lunar lander in 2009. In addition, the New Horizons mission to Pluto remains funded.

Mars appears to be a big winner. It's $691 million budget request for 2005 — $84 million more than it expected at this time last year -- includes $175 million, a nearly 50 percent increase for the 2009 Mars Science Laboratory, a nuclear powered rover in development.

It also includes $25 million to continue development of the 2009 Mars Telesat Orbiter. An additional $56 million was included in the budget for a laser communications demonstration payload on the 2009 Telesat mission.

Under Bush's request, NASA's 2005 Earth Sciences budget would drop $41 million to $1.485 billion in 2005. The decline is set to continue through 2008 before bumping up slightly to $1.474 billion in 2009.

SPACE.com's Jim Banke contributed to this report from Houston, Texas.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; nasa; spaceprogram

1 posted on 01/30/2004 7:08:19 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers
So how much of the 16.2 billion is an actual increase over the current budget? This sounds more like a major shift in funding to different programs within NASA than dumping large amounts of new $$$.

Personally, I'd much rather spend money on space exploration than on social programs.

2 posted on 01/30/2004 7:17:47 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
You know, I really don't think it is prudent to add more spending (even though this article only details budget shuffling) especially when the expected cost of Medicare rose 33% to 540 billion dollars.

I know that some debt is good for the economy, but I do think it is important to start balancing the budget now that the economy is in rebound. A balanced budget would also help reelection chances.
3 posted on 01/30/2004 7:21:01 PM PST by UCSC Republican (Guns don't kill people. Abortion clinics kill people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
While Congress has to approve the budget, probably just before next fall's elections, NASA has its marching orders. There are probably a lot of people itching to get started.
4 posted on 01/30/2004 7:22:18 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Anybody interested, here is the long term budget.
 
 
 
 

5 posted on 01/30/2004 7:23:55 PM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UCSC Republican
Not to mention we are in the middle of a very very expensive war. Bush's budget priorities don't seem to recognize that.
6 posted on 01/30/2004 7:40:38 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Five billion dollars for the Shuttle. Won't be sorry to see that go. What's nice is the blue region: Exploration will go from about $2.5 billion to $13 billion, or so, by FY20. This is what NASA should be about, imo.
7 posted on 01/30/2004 8:00:03 PM PST by LibWhacker (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: LibWhacker
Personally, I would like to see the shuttle stay, as a space truck, delivering supplies and picking up the trash. That was it's original design. I don't see a space plane in the budget, meaning that NASA is going to still depend on rockets for delivery.

Realistically, I know that all wishes can't be budgeted.

The emphasis on the moon and mars is great!!!

People need to realize that President Bush simply reorganized the priorities, rather than added funding. The first real funding addition (above inflation) is in 2009, and that is for $1 billion.
10 posted on 01/30/2004 8:14:03 PM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

NASA budget bookmark bump...
11 posted on 01/30/2004 9:12:47 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
.

This is all about who the 1st Men/Women on Mars will be.

Free Americans or Communist Chinese..?

.
12 posted on 01/30/2004 9:17:50 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com.N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Industry and government sources said that money is earmarked for start-up firms such as Kistler Aerospace

I thought they went bankrupt, Elon Musk's rockets should play an ever increasing role in this new initiative.

13 posted on 01/30/2004 9:29:35 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
In addition, the New Horizons mission to Pluto remains funded.

Whooohooo. I was hoping this program wasn't cut, and, for now at least, it isn't. Anyways, at the moment, it does look more like shifting priorities then actually giving NASA a boost. Still, even simply shifting of priorties is still better then what NASA was doing before.

14 posted on 01/30/2004 11:31:57 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (Kerry. When you need to katchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5
The only two things I do not like are the apparent cancellations of the "Beyond Einstein" missions and the Next Gen. Launch Systems. I hope that they throw the latter over to the military. I know there has to be priorities but I would rather see them cancel the PC "Earth Science" missions Thant the Astrophysics ones. That is probably too much to ask, I suppose.
15 posted on 01/31/2004 4:03:12 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Do you have any idea what that chart would have looked like on 31Jan03 - one day before the Columbia accident?
16 posted on 01/31/2004 4:12:55 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson