Replies

He got elected because of the liberal electorate in his home state and the fact that he is better funded than any challenger has been. Period.

"It would seem that perhaps he was more believable than Ellsberg"

Obviously you don not know much about Ellsberg.

Also, "me thinks you doth protest too much." For a "conservative", you are sure keen on sticking up for Kerry, an avowed liberal. You are also keen on bashing Bush.

I have no problem with Ellsberg or Kerry and since I am from Texas, neither has concerned me up to this point... However, as you are now going to question my motives instead of my facts, help yourself.... By the way, I am a moderate... Social Moderate, Fiscal Conservative.. Independent Minded... And we are both, from our perspectives, simply stating what we believe to be facts...

I try to let facts speak for themselves... I don't know Kerry and I think Edwards or Clark would be better candidates anyway....

However, if bin Laden is captured in August as I estimate, all will be well and Bush will be re-elected...

As I said before, I do tire of the divisive and negative rhetoric and I do not see it coming from me...

I see it on too many issues and it is not necessary...

Can we simply win on the merits of the conservative platform...

My problem with stories such as this are that smear tactics, recalls, and dirty tricks may give us short term success but long term, we look like people who are drunk on power and think no one else has a right to say anything... That is what I do not want to see... That is what I am sticking up for....