[RS]

"The statutory commentary when the statute was enacted indicates as much. I am not goint to sit here are retype my annotated copy of FS."

Too bad for Rush the comments did not make it into the law, eh ?
I wonder if your annotated copy will be allowed in as evidence ?

Did you happen to notice when you went through the FS that all of the elements you cite are chargable seperately ?

[longtermmemmory]

If the statute is ambiguous enough to allow the argument, it is ambigious enough to file a notice of intent to challenge the constitutionality. If the judge wants to pass the ball they can then certify the question up to the 4th DCA. (One exit north on I-95)

A defendant needs grounds to argue. The commentary gives such grounds.