Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
"If the maid's story is true and Rush's last perscription was 1999, "

Just where did you pull this out of ? Where does Cline say anything about a "last prescription ?



Don't you EVER look at the links I provide ?

Here is the Application of the Search Warrents on the Doctor-shopping allegations -
His buys noted were from Mar-Sept 2003 - AFTER the maid stopped supplying him with drugs in 2002

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/rushsearch1.html
96 posted on 02/01/2004 4:23:02 PM PST by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: RS
according to the enquirer, the doctor's stopped supply rush in 1999. The maid's story is that after that he was buying form her because he could not get any from doctors.

Not my words, just what the maid has indicated publicly.

Do you ever read you own links?
97 posted on 02/01/2004 4:27:26 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: RS
The list of medications aquired from the pharmacies obviously indicates the 1999 "end" which the maid gave to the enquirer is wrong.

Keep the illegal street purchases seperate from the doctor shopping.

The maid's story has an inconsistency there. She said she was Rush's supplyer because in 1999 he could not get pills from the doctor. BUT the search warrant the SA obtained states that Rush DID have legal perscriptions after 1999, which contradicts the story the maid gave to the Enquirer.
99 posted on 02/01/2004 4:33:07 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson