Replies

Huh ? One of you is talking about the Clines selling him drugs and the other is talking about the doctor-shopping , ehich has nothing to do with the Clines...

Thats what the blind want to do is confuse you. I'm trying to see that Sarah doesn't buy into LTM's paralegal garbage. Anything the maid has provided evidence wise is irrelevant to the felony of doctor shopping. I've yet to hear anyone refute or challenge the list of overlapping prescriptions alleged to have been provided to RUSH. That's what's going to put a felony on his record, not some drug dealing maid.

Excuse I am not a paralegal. I am a lawyer.

The law is there for all to read. The ethics rules are there for all to read. The ethics hotline is there for any lawyer to call.

How about the fact that the law specifically says DOSSAGE IS IRELEVANT which I have posted. I can have 20 doctors giving me overlapping perscriptions as long as they comply with the law. Here we have four doctors, one in california, at least two in the same office, and the remaining be the specialist.

I gave you the law. YOU choose to be obtuse.

I have cited about the law putting all first time offenders into the Drug Court intervention program.

The Doctor Shopping statute was written for dealing not users. Dealers who lie to doctors to get drugs to supply users NOT for end users. This is why the SA is shooting to charge under an improper statute.

As a user, Rush gets no felony record. That is if you treat him the same as anyone else who gets caught red handed. Of course rush has not been caught red handed.

You refuse to see the reality and the law here. Perhaps after you go to law school and pass a few bar exams we could have some intelligent commentaty from you.