Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClintonBeGone; _Jim; RS
Just got this from longtermmemory by mail, sounds logical to me (not concerning his guilt, but his likelihood of getting off...)


'The absolute only thing we have to offer an illegal street purchase is the maid's story. The only proof she offered was emails which can't be authenticated, and audio tapes which reporters have described as extreme poor quality. Odd how everything else is leaked but these tapes and emails. If the emails could have been directly authenticated to Rush, they would have been an exception to the heresay rule as an admission againts interest
'
42 posted on 01/31/2004 4:16:01 PM PST by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Sarah; _Jim; RS
'The absolute only thing we have to offer an illegal street purchase is the maid's story. The only proof she offered was emails which can't be authenticated, and audio tapes which reporters have described as extreme poor quality. Odd how everything else is leaked but these tapes and emails. If the emails could have been directly authenticated to Rush, they would have been an exception to the heresay rule as an admission againts interest '

This sounds as if it was written by some first semester paralegal. The maid and any evidence she has is irrelevant. What matters for criminal charges is the list of prescriptions, the name of his doctors and the dates Rush acquired his prescription drugs. Longtermmemory and all his sycophants have yet to explain away that cruitial piece of evidence.

43 posted on 01/31/2004 4:47:36 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/" target="_blank">hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Sarah; _Jim; RS
'The absolute only thing we have to offer an illegal street purchase is the maid's story. The only proof she offered was emails which can't be authenticated, and audio tapes which reporters have described as extreme poor quality. Odd how everything else is leaked but these tapes and emails. If the emails could have been directly authenticated to Rush, they would have been an exception to the heresay rule as an admission againts interest '

This sounds as if it was written by some first semester paralegal. The maid and any evidence she has is irrelevant. What matters for criminal charges is the list of prescriptions, the name of his doctors and the dates Rush acquired his prescription drugs. Longtermmemory and all his sycophants have yet to explain away that crucial piece of evidence.

44 posted on 01/31/2004 4:47:52 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/" target="_blank">hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Sarah
Sarah if you don't want a private conversation then don't bother emailing people privatly. I will be more than happy to respond to you in public.

Perhaps I too should be writing "private" caviats at the top of my emails.

I will know better about you next time.

I stand by what I wrote.
57 posted on 01/31/2004 11:42:11 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson