[CMAC51]

It's irrelvant to whether the prescription list provided in the search warrant is a valid list of the drugs, doctors and timing the prescriptions were filled. Unless you dispute the vality of that information, and you can't because Rush isn't, you have no leg to stand on.

Apparently you don't want to be bothered with reading the transcript, or you wouldn't have asked such an inane question. So we'll keep it at your level. Repeat it very slowly and maybe you will grasp the question. "Where is the criminality or evidence of criminality?" Repeat it several time if necessary. Criminality is a big word and it may take you a few tries. Webster's has a dictionary online if you need help with the word.

Now, don't come back unless you have something worthwhile in total. I'm getting a crick in my neck trying to stoop down to your level.

[ClintonBeGone]

It's very simple to understand what the crime is that Rush may have committed, and the prescription list found with the search warrant is prima facia evidence of such a crime. The only element that has yet to be confirmed is whether ALL of his subsequent doctors knew of the previous prescriptions that were provided in the prior 30 day period. How does a transcript of a hearing refute anything contained in that prescription list? Only a juror that wrote in crayon would have a hard time getting this. What's your excuse?