Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
"but his service was evidently highly commendable. "

I agree and to try to attack him on his time in the service is not only disingenuous but also dishonors veterans.
8 posted on 01/29/2004 8:57:06 PM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: OneTimeLurker
It isn't about what he did in the service. It's about what he did after he got out of the service.
17 posted on 01/29/2004 9:15:56 PM PST by clintonh8r (Vietnam veteran against John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: OneTimeLurker
If you consider not finishing your tour of duty and joining the VVAW in organizing protests with the Communists, Jane Fonda, etc. honorable then I suppose he was. I personally think his service was disgraceful and the circumstances under which he received his medal was questionable. It is politically correct to say that someone is heroic because he served, but the fact that he endangered even further the lives of his fellow soldiers upon returning home and lied about atrocities they committed (admitting later that he never actually witnessed these incidents) does not make him a hero. Nor does the fact that he was sweeping an investigation under the rug in the early 90's that could have potentially brought live POW/MIA's home make him deserving of honor. I'm sorry, but I just do not see it.
22 posted on 01/29/2004 9:48:25 PM PST by Time4Atlas2Shrug (Kerry: Commie Symp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson