Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IDF troops, 20 army vehicles enter Palestinian Authority controlled city of Bethlehem
Haaretz News Ticker ^ | 1/29/2003 | AP

Posted on 01/29/2004 7:44:36 PM PST by yonif

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: American in Israel
Thank you for the fascinating perspective. There is indeed virtue in making the Jihadi-family suffer, but, alas, one's sense of moral outrage is not assuaged by trading blood for stone, especially the precious and innocent blood of Israeli citizens. In a more enlightened age, one not infected with the planetary disease called "anti-semitism", Israel would eject these savages whence they came and civilize all of West Bank and Gaza.

I am frustrated and sick at heart at what you are enduring over there.

101 posted on 01/30/2004 2:45:43 PM PST by Blennos (hoste, opto ut seis felicior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: tubavil
"We wouldn't want to prevent free travel for the financiers of arab, muslim terrorism against US citizens while the hoi polloi are busy dying, now would we?"

Who are you to judge our President? What have you done for your country lately?
102 posted on 01/30/2004 2:50:40 PM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
Have no doubt. Israel is able to do what is needed. There are other, outside forces at work here (i.e. roadmap to "peace").
103 posted on 01/30/2004 3:47:37 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
I got to get pictures of some of these homes for you guys, they are unreal. Villages with PA figures in them are sprouting 5 story 50 room buildings like mushrooms since the $130,000,000 cash bonus from Bush was granted for "emergency operating funds" for the "poor" oppressed Palestinians. Houses that you all could not afford in your wildest dreams.

When I was in Israel 2 weeks ago, we traveled through some of these places. The guide told us the lies they propagate such as them in terrible housing, or no housing at all, and also that most live in tents, etc. It is disgusting. Many of those houses have satellite dishes on them, 2 or 3 cars, and fountains.

Another source of the aid they get is from the UN Refugee Fund. In order to get funds, you must still be alive. So what do the Arab do? THey never register the dead, therefore they continue to get funds from their relatives. And the population keeps growing. This is also a reason why the accurate number of Arab refugees is not known.

104 posted on 01/30/2004 3:50:55 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: BayouCoyote
Did it ever start?

This is the most they can do right now. The US has envoys in Israel trying to restart the roadmap to "peace."

105 posted on 01/30/2004 3:52:57 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
Where are your answers?

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york091102.asp

September 11, 2002 8:00 a.m.
The bin Ladens' Great Escape
How the U.S. helped Osama's family leave the country after 9/11.

Bill Carter, the FBI spokesman, is adamant. "We were given full access to the individuals on that plane," he says, "and we were satisfied that we did not believe any of those individuals had anything to do with the 9/11 plots."

The plane to which Carter refers was an aircraft chartered by the Saudi government in the days after the terrorist attacks. The individuals were two dozen members of Osama bin Laden's extended family who had been living in the United States. Saying they were afraid that family members might suffer retribution in the U.S., the Saudis asked for American assistance in getting them out of the country. With the help of the FBI, the Saudis and the bin Laden family chartered an aircraft to pick up family members in Los Angeles, Orlando, and Washington, D.C. The bin Laden plane then flew the relatives to Boston, where ? one week after the attacks ? the group left Logan Airport bound for Jeddah.

At the time, the massive 9/11 investigation was just beginning. The government had begun detaining hundreds of people who were held for days, weeks, or months while U.S. agents performed extensive background checks and interviews. In addition, the government announced its intention to question thousands of men from Muslim countries who might simply have known something of interest to the investigation. "The Department of Justice is waging a deliberate campaign of arrest and detention to protect American lives," Attorney General John Ashcroft said on November 27.

But the bin Ladens did not have to worry about that. While FBI agents looked into bin Laden family members in the Boston area immediately after September 11, it appears that the agents' first chance to interview them ? or other family members who lived elsewhere in the country ? came on the day they left the U.S. Each family member was given the all-clear on the basis of a single, day-of-departure interview ? conducted, in Bill Carter's words, "at the airport, as they were about to leave."

Asked by National Review whether the FBI had conducted a full and thorough investigation of all the family members before allowing them to go, Carter repeated his earlier statement: "The FBI had an opportunity to interview the individuals on that plane, and we were satisfied with the information they provided." Asked again, he said the same thing. "Unless you have evidence to stop them from leaving the country, they have every right to do that," Carter explained. "The bin Laden family is very large, and for the most part are involved in legitimate enterprises. The fact of the matter is that because of September 11, some of these individuals felt it would be better to leave the country. They have every right to do that."

But some law-enforcement experts found the abbreviated investigation puzzling. "That's highly unusual, and they could not have done a thorough and complete interview," said John L. Martin, the former chief of internal security for the Justice Department. "It was obvious at the time that the Bureau did not have the kind of intelligence to know who was behind [the September 11 attacks], how they were financed, and what the U.S. connections might have been." Also, Martin said, "It is an absolute rule of law enforcement that the agent or officers conducting the interviews control the interview, and that the persons of interest, suspects, or prospective defendants do not set the ground rules for the interview."

In addition, it is a routine law-enforcement practice to question ? sometimes repeatedly and in great detail ? family members of suspects in murder cases. Investigators do not usually presume that a relative has no connection or knowledge of a crime; instead, they usually conduct an investigation to make sure the relatives can be eliminated as suspects or witnesses. While that is going on, the instincts of law enforcement are normally to freeze all potential suspects and witnesses in place until the investigation has reached some conclusions.

What raises even more questions about the FBI's handling of the bin Ladens is that in the days immediately after the attack, law-enforcement agencies were nearly overwhelmed by the task of unraveling the plot and uncovering al Qaeda's complex worldwide financial network. Investigators were still trying to retrace the hijackers' steps and learn who might have assisted them along the way. They were also facing the enormous job of trying to uncover any other terrorist cells that might be in the country. The FBI in particular was almost back on its heels, suffering from (it was revealed later) a lack of communication between its various offices about key evidence in the case.

And the bin Ladens seemed an obvious choice for intensive investigation. Most press accounts of the family state flatly that the relatives are estranged from Osama bin Laden and condemn his work. But bin Laden has more than 50 siblings, and it is perhaps overly optimistic to think that every single one of them not only does not approve of his actions but also has no knowledge of his support and financing. Besides, there are several published reports that suggest otherwise.

In October 2001, ABC News interviewed a sister-in-law of Osama bin Laden, who was asked whether bin Laden family members had given money to Osama. "I don't know that," Carmen bin Laden answered, "but my opinion is yes . . . I think they would say, okay, this is ? for Islam they would give. You know, for Islam they would give." Carmen bin Laden is the estranged wife of Osama bin Laden's brother Yeslam, who runs the Saudi Investment Company in Switzerland. Family friends have contradicted her account, but in March of this year, French police searched Yeslam bin Laden's villa in Cannes, reportedly looking for evidence of terrorism-related money laundering involving the Saudi Investment Company. Swiss police also searched other properties connected to the firm.

In addition, investigators believe that another bin Laden relative, Osama's brother-in-law Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, is thought to be an important figure in al Qaeda. Khalifa has been linked to Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, as well as to the October 2000 bombing of the USS Cole. Khalifa is also thought to have provided crucial start-up money to Abu Sayyaf, the Philippine terrorist group.

Then there are the bin Ladens' alleged ties to a Bahamas-based bank that is suspected of laundering money to terrorist groups. And, finally, there are Osama bin Laden's communications with his stepmother, Al-Khalifa bin Laden. He reportedly called her days before September 11 to tell her that "something big" would soon take place.

It may turn out that no one among the bin Ladens in America knew anything about any of the people involved or any of their businesses. It is true that the family members had been the subject of some scrutiny in the past. "That family had been looked at very, very carefully in the two-year period leading up to September 11," after the al Qaeda bombings of American embassies in East Africa, said retired CIA official Vince Cannistraro. But the fact that the September 11 attacks occurred raises obvious questions about how thorough the U.S. law-enforcement and intelligence agencies' investigation of bin Laden was. In light of that, how much did the FBI know about the bin Laden family when it allowed them to leave the country? And could investigators have learned everything they needed to know on the basis of the day-of-departure airport interviews?

It's hard to reconstruct precisely how the departures were arranged. The only public statement the Saudis have made was in October 2001, when Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to the U.S., said on CNN, "His Majesty said it's not fair for these innocent people to be subjected to any harm. On the other hand, we understood the high emotions. So with the coordination with the FBI, we got them all out." Otherwise, officials at the Saudi embassy in Washington decline to comment.

When NR called an official at Logan Airport, he said, "You have to talk to the State Department. They're the ones who set it up." But a State Department source said the department "played no role" in the matter. "This is not something we would have brokered," the source said. "Bandar does not need Foggy Bottom to get a phone call returned by the White House." That seemed a clear hint that the White House was involved, but the White House declined immediate comment, saying it would look into the matter.

However it happened, the bin Ladens are long gone. Some have returned, at least for visits ? they live in an international set that divides its time among Jeddah, London, Paris, and New York. Others have stayed away. Now, a year after 9/11, should U.S law enforcement ever need them, investigators will know where they are ? in Saudi Arabia, out of reach.
106 posted on 01/30/2004 4:42:18 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: montag813
The prisoner giveaway marks the lowest point in the young history of Israel.

The swap of 400 Arab prisoners for one Israeli who, I hope, would soon become a prisoner in his own right reflects the real value of both.

What is much more important, is the exchange of the bodies. Here, the rate is 3 Israelis to 59 Arabs... and it could, and some day would be 0 to 590... or, Baruch Hashem, 5900. Perfection has no limits.

107 posted on 01/30/2004 8:58:56 PM PST by Neophyte (Nazists, Communists, Islamists... what the heck is the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: yonif
The IDF has entered Bethlehem? How did this happen? Holy Crap!! So then if they continue westward, they'll come to Allentown next. Allentown has great fortifications from which to fight. And if we don't stop them there, when they get here to Reading, by God we have hills and mountains like Afghanistan and will drive those bastards straight back to where they came from!! We'll wage a guerilla war like they never saw!! They'll be crying for mommy when the Reading brigade get ahold them, I'm not afraid to tell you!! What's that? Oh, Bethlehem, like the birth place of Jesus? Oh, never mind..........
108 posted on 01/31/2004 4:19:31 AM PST by the tongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
WHEN oh when will ISRAEL just wax the pals, I think what SHARON did was stupid ,by letting these smelly bastards out of prison he is showing that he is weak ,these people take anykind of kindness for a weakness, they are the scurge of our planet and so is their religion.
109 posted on 01/31/2004 8:33:50 AM PST by douglas1 (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: tubavil
"Where are your answers?"

What is your point? I read various accounts every day regarding the war on terror and what should have or shouldn't have been done. I don't have an inside pipeline to the White House, Pentagon, CIA, FBI or Homeland Security. Maybe I could rightly judge if I did have access to all the facts. However, I doubt that you have a pipeline either and I get tired of this Bush bashing when we should be uniting for his 2004 reelection.
110 posted on 01/31/2004 11:32:12 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
Standard disclaimers that are unfortunately still necessary on FR: I AM NOT: troll, bush basher, DU'er, plant, mole, sleeper, 'rat, Mossad, DPRK agent whose mission is subverting Jim Robinson, etc.

That said...

Bush sealed his political fate the day his illegal alien amnesty became 'public.' It's already over for him. That was the final nail in his political coffin.

He has betrayed both his conservative base and his religious base (of which I am both). Silence on Ten Commandment removal and radical homosexual agenda advances, plus a socialist domestic agenda that would make Klinton cheer (How many times have you heard Klinton criticize bush on this?), and he's already outspent Klinton by far, even factoring out 9/11 and the war. And now amnesty for federal law breakers, all for votes, return for political contributions, and slave labor in the 48.

Bush and Rove are counting on the "but there's nobody else to vote for and whatever we do they sure as hell won't vote for a psychiatric emergency case like dean." They are partially right but completely mistaken. Conservatives are sick and f***ing tired of being screwed by the leaders that they trusted and elected. They will simply sit out the next election. Since bush only won with 537 votes last time, and the demonic left's hatred for him has increased tenfold, and
a significant portion of his core is too disgusted with him to re-elect, IT IS OVER.

Polls already show that it is a statistical dead heat between bush and a 'rat nominee.

He can produce UBL anytime between now and November and it won't make any difference.

111 posted on 01/31/2004 5:26:36 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
OOOOps, I forgot.

Yes, I do have a direct pipeline to muslim terror, several in fact. And bush isn't even coming close to dealing with the problem. I could write 100 paragraphs on why, but suffice it to say we're 2.5 years away fwom 9/11 and are just starting to scratch the surface.

muslim terrorists still operate essentially unimpeded from JFK to AMW.
112 posted on 01/31/2004 5:33:00 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tubavil
Methinks you've deceived yourself. First of all, I believe W is a genuine believer and partaker in the salvation that comes only through Jesus Christ. Secondly, you have already written him off, so I have to believe you are lacking in your faith in the power of the Almighty. I am a believer and a conservative and I know that if President Bush is God's man for the times, nothing man can do will prevent him from 4 more years of service to this country. Because I don't know you personally, I will not judge your motives. However, God's wisdom is higher than man's and foolish is the one who portends to know what the future holds.
113 posted on 01/31/2004 7:00:26 PM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
What Israel needs is a leader or two like Sam Grant, and Wm. T.Sherman, who realized early on that the only thing that would make the South quit fighting was to make it so dammed painful for them that they would have to give up. The Pal-lies see restraint, and a weakness, and it will only be when they are beaten down to their knees that they will start to behave themselves.
114 posted on 02/01/2004 12:06:40 AM PST by BooBoo1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson