Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
Well, again, what are our chances of getting another Thomas with a Democrat making the appointments?

With the Reps holding the Senate, even a Dem will have to do a little give-and-take to get their nominees through, especially after the fed judges that the Dems filibustered. If the Reps decide to play hardball, they can keep it to an "O'Connor" at a minimum.

150 posted on 01/29/2004 7:09:59 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Nanodik
Bush will get the conservative judges he want only if we continue to support the "R"s. We have our work cut out. There will only be compromise if we bicker and fight among ourselves. How badly do you want those judges and are you willing to work for them?
166 posted on 01/29/2004 7:14:16 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: Nanodik
It's a totally unnecessary and avoidable risk. I see no reason whatsoever to shunt Bush aside for a Democrat.
174 posted on 01/29/2004 7:15:48 PM PST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: Nanodik
Anyone who says "Reps" is clearly from DU - that's a term they use. No conservitive says "reps".

It's GOP, dammit... G O P. Or "pubbies".

Please, go back to DU... nobody is buying your crap.
723 posted on 01/29/2004 10:41:12 PM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson