1 posted on
01/29/2004 4:06:15 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Intelligence sources said then and still say now that some of the heaviest fighting by special forces occurred around Al Qaim, on the Syrian border. The Iraqis were desperate to keep that highway open to continue the access to Syria for those convoys which were carrying senior Iraqi officials, carloads of cash, and the people and materials key to Saddam's WMDs.
Despite all we were told about senior regime officials fleeing to Syria, almost the entire deck of cards has been apprehended, all of them in Iraq.
2 posted on
01/29/2004 4:12:14 PM PST by
John H K
To: neverdem
Question: If there's a known crack house in your neighborhood - known as a crackhouse because people buy crack there, known crack dealers go in and out, etc. - and the police chief orders a raid that takes several months or more to enact....and when they cops finally get there they find no crack.....would people be saying the police chief lied?
Or would they think the crack house took their crack and flushed it down the john, sold all they had, or moved it to their friend's house in the next town?
3 posted on
01/29/2004 4:15:22 PM PST by
Lizavetta
(Savage is right - extreme liberalism is a mental disorder.)
To: neverdem
It isn't relevant in any case.
We moved a "counter" -- getting troops in Iraq. Every play Risk? We need a military position there.
Did Bush lie? Well, lets just say he took the most optimal intelligence to make the case we needed to have an excuse to position our troops there. Who cares if WMD are there, or were there? That was a political position for the public.
7 posted on
01/29/2004 4:41:29 PM PST by
dark_lord
(The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
To: neverdem
Jed Babbin, the author of this piece, coined the saying "Going to war without France is like going deerhunting without your accordion."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson