Skip to comments.
Feinstein Asks EPA to Waive Rule on Fuel [MTBE]
LA Times ^
| 1.29.04
| LA Times
Posted on 01/29/2004 12:39:28 PM PST by ambrose
Feinstein Asks EPA to Waive Rule on Fuel The agency may drop some gasoline additive regulations in New Hampshire; the same is sought for California.
By Elizabeth Douglass, Times Staff Writer
Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Wednesday called for the Environmental Protection Agency to waive some federal gasoline rules for California after the EPA proposed dropping certain pollution restrictions for gas sold in New Hampshire.
The EPA last week proposed that fuel producers in New Hampshire could make reformulated gasoline without adding in an "oxygenate," such as ethanol or MTBE, as required under the federal Clean Air Act.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cleanairact; environment; epa; gasoline; mtbe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
01/29/2004 12:39:31 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Isnt this contradictory of her fellow liberal eco-maniacs?
2
posted on
01/29/2004 12:41:28 PM PST
by
smith288
(If terrorist hate George W. Bush, then he has my vote!)
To: ambrose
a permanent removal of the requirement for ANY oxygenate? Most states are switching to ethanol from MTBE (which is a good idea, this MTBE has been a total disaster), so what is this about? Or is just just temporary because there isn't enough ethanol?
3
posted on
01/29/2004 12:42:23 PM PST
by
oceanview
To: smith288
maybe some of the eco-maniacs have seen what this MTBE is doing and realize that just regular old gasoline is much better for the environment.
4
posted on
01/29/2004 12:43:18 PM PST
by
oceanview
To: ambrose
We are all gonna die. For once it's a liberal doing the killing. Neato.
5
posted on
01/29/2004 12:44:42 PM PST
by
snooker
To: oceanview
maybe some of the eco-maniacs have seen what this MTBE is doing and realize that just regular old gasoline is much better for the environment.I agree with you. In Maine, MTBE was found in many wells. Thanks libs for slowly killing us.
6
posted on
01/29/2004 12:45:53 PM PST
by
New Perspective
(Proud father of a 2 month old of son with Down's)
To: oceanview
this MTBE has been a total disaster During the last Democratic debate, John Kerry said that the producers of MTBE should be held responsible and punished for the negative effects of the chemical on the environment. I'm not real familiar with the history of this additive. Any idea why Kerry thinks the MTBE manufacturers should be held responsible when it is the EPA who is mandating its addition to gasoline?
To: oceanview
Most states are switching to ethanol from MTBE But modern cars with computer controlled fuel injection systems don't need any oxygenates added to their fuel to reduce unburned hydrocarbons. They automatically reduce the amount of air in the fuel air mixture. Oxygnenates reduce the amount of chemical energy available in fuel, because they are an oxidizer. The only reason why oxygenates were added to gasoline was so that older cars could reduce their unburned hydrocarbons. It would be better to get those cars off the road. I doubt if the production of ethanol breaks even in terms of energy used and useful energy produced. The mandate to use ethanol was entirely polically motivated to increase the demand for Midwestern corn.
8
posted on
01/29/2004 12:52:22 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: BlackRazor
Any idea why Kerry thinks the MTBE manufacturers should be held responsible when it is the EPA who is mandating its addition to gasoline? The potential problems of MTBE were predicted before the mandate was ever put in place.
9
posted on
01/29/2004 12:54:27 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Paleo Conservative
The potential problems of MTBE were predicted before the mandate was ever put in place. Even so, why does that make the manufacturers liable, if it's the EPA who forced its use? Did the manufacturers lobby the EPA for the mandate, saying MTBE was a cure-all? Or did the bulk of the MTBE problems occur prior to the EPA mandate?
To: ambrose
And we all know that if President Bush had made this exact suggestion the reaction would be the same. NOT
To: BlackRazor
of course, but the trial lawyers want it, thats why the Dems want to go after the producers. Not that you will ever hear a republican explaining this simply and clearly to the people of course.
To: BlackRazor
Even so, why does that make the manufacturers liable It shouldn't. The mandate was forced on the industry despite serious warnings about the problems MTBE and other oxygenates could cause and doubts about the need for oxygenates in the first place. MTBE is soluable in water precisely because it has an ether group which contains oxygen. Most organic compounds are non-polar and are not very soluable in water. The fact that most organic contaminents are both insoluable in water and less dense than wather (hence they float) that allows them to be rather more easily separated from water. It is the soluability in water and the ability of MTBE to actually migrate through aquifers faster than water that causes the contamination problem.
13
posted on
01/29/2004 1:27:50 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: ambrose
The grassroots movement to remove MTBE began here in Fairbanks. One of the founders is an oilman.
14
posted on
01/29/2004 1:29:49 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: BlackRazor
I don't know, but I'll bet the reason is do, re, mi ($).
There is talk that crude levels are low, that China is buying more of it, and that gas is about to go through the roof.
In envirowacko states, they have passed laws that exacerbate the price problem by mandating boutique blends of fuel. Illinois is another state that has this issue.
By waving the rules, you do avoid the MTBE issue, but I also believe that you reduce that component of price pressure in those states.
I'm just making a guess.
15
posted on
01/29/2004 1:35:03 PM PST
by
RinaseaofDs
(Only those who dare truly live - CGA 88 Class Motto)
To: Paleo Conservative
Thanks for the explanation. I'm a ChemE, so I actually understand what you're saying! :)
To: farmfriend
ping
To: ambrose; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
18
posted on
01/30/2004 1:14:46 AM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
19
posted on
01/30/2004 3:05:26 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: oceanview; Carry_Okie; farmfriend; Phil V.; eldoradude; ScottinSacto; marsh2
When I was a Repellican, I got a resolution passed by our County Board of Supervisors to make our county an M.T.B.E. "free zone" but of course, it was just a symbolic gesture... Oh well.
Your comment was a "direct hit!" Another reason I'm now more than a little embarrassed to have belonged to the Repellican party in the "gay nineties!" (Clintonesque, don'tcha think?)
I'm now a "Decline to State" and will remain so until some danged Repellican, somewhere in CA begins to consistently articulate ideas, concepts and convictions that resonate with righteous conservative constitutional principles!!! That's my story and I'ma stickin to it!!!
20
posted on
01/30/2004 8:57:25 AM PST
by
SierraWasp
(America is our house! Throwing open the door to trespassers is wrong and everybody knows it !!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson