Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nanodik
I did not especially care for Bush 1 or Dole. But look at the vote totals, and who voted for Perot. More would have voted for R than D. Clinton never had over 50%.
218 posted on 01/29/2004 6:29:56 PM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: mathluv
But look at the vote totals, and who voted for Perot. More would have voted for R than D.

This still points to the fact that the RP ran crappy candidates. Had they ran someone that people could have got excited about, they would have won. When was the last time you saw an ad campaign that instead of claiming the product was great, just said that all the other competitors stuff was crap? I see Republicrats do this all the time. "Vote for me because I am not a Dem!" and then they wonder why voters did not turn out for them. You don't succeed in any type of market by claiming to be the lesser of two evils.

222 posted on 01/29/2004 6:45:24 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson