Skip to comments.
Farewell Mapplethorpe, Hello Shakespeare (Roger Kimball on NEA, the W. way)
National Review Online ^
| January 29, 2004
| Roger Kimball
Posted on 01/29/2004 10:37:21 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: NutCrackerBoy
Holy Mother of God! What a PR puff piece.
Did Rove see the s**tstorm here last night and have this rushed out?
2
posted on
01/29/2004 10:41:16 AM PST
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered. ©)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: NutCrackerBoy
Doing it "right" is still no excuse for the government to be funding the NEA at all in the first place...
4
posted on
01/29/2004 10:42:02 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(YEEEEEAAAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHH! <splat>)
To: NutCrackerBoy
I'm glad to hear this. I saw the "Cremaster" display in New York 6 months ago. Nothing like some gay guy with arrested psychological development playing out his Greek-mythology/Masons-coming-to-get me weirdness on the public dime to sour one's trip to the Big Apple.
5
posted on
01/29/2004 10:42:13 AM PST
by
wizardoz
("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: NutCrackerBoy
Did you check out Gioia's website? Looks pretty legitimate.
Many years ago, when my father was fairly well connected to the Reagan Whitehouse, a very famous ( multiple Tony award winning) Broadway producer came to him to ask that he promote his name to Reagan's people as a possible high-ranking official at the NEA. This was a man of tremendous character and tasteful artistic sensibilities. If things had worked out, and if more people like him had been left to guide the NEA, many of us might well have a different opinion of the NEA today. My point being, that regardless of what I think about Government sponsorship of the arts, it looks indeed like Gioia might just be this kind of man, and that he might just be able to make this organization acceptable to us in many respects.
7
posted on
01/29/2004 10:49:28 AM PST
by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for Girls!)
To: NutCrackerBoy
Rove don't get it. It's the existance of the NEA that is the problem. My opposition differs not one whit.
Mapplethorpe or motel art, I don't care.
The money is wasted. Spend it on keeping soldiers' families off food stamps. Or just don't borrow (tax) the funds to begin with.
They seem to think we prefer one variety of liberalism over another.
To: NutCrackerBoy
ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL YOU DOLT!! I don't care if they do ANOTHER remake the Lord of the Rings! Add to the fact its immoral and simple theft!
Finally Goya won't be around forever nor will Dubya. Their replacements might be Libs who will have quite the time doling out this "increase."
9
posted on
01/29/2004 10:52:05 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Principles, not blind loyalty)
To: Cosmo
Rush appears to be using FR as his "show prep" tool again.
To: gov_bean_ counter
Think he's reading this thread?
Hi Rush:)
11
posted on
01/29/2004 10:53:58 AM PST
by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for Girls!)
To: kevkrom
If you compare the constitutionality of the welfare state versus the constitutionality of modest arts funding, I think a better case can be made for arts funding. Neither would pass the Madison test, of course. But let's keep things in perspective, both in the intent relative to the Constitution, and in the size of the cost.
President Bush is playing with the cards dealt him.
To: NutCrackerBoy
Big Government is good, so long as the right people are running it, huh?
That's the same argument my socialist/communist in-laws make - we just need the right people to run the nanny state.
To: Cosmo
Seemed to pick up the topics as soon as they were posted. Coinkidink?
To: Arviragus
Just out of curiosity, why did you go in the first place?I was dragged in by the folks I was visiting. They aren't very politically aware, although by the time we left I could see that they had a pretty bad taste in their mouths and I have high hopes for their future development.
15
posted on
01/29/2004 10:56:49 AM PST
by
wizardoz
("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
To: NutCrackerBoy
I don't know how many votes GWB thought this would buy him but I'm getting very disenchanted with my president. He's either taking the conservative vote for granted or decided he doesn't need it.
16
posted on
01/29/2004 10:57:48 AM PST
by
Spok
To: gov_bean_ counter; Cosmo
Rush got it off National Review Online where it was posted at 11:38 am. Posted on FR at 1:37 pm.
To: NutCrackerBoy
Bump.
To: gov_bean_ counter
Rush appears to be using FR as his "show prep" tool again.??...meaning no offence. Is that bad? :|
19
posted on
01/29/2004 11:00:29 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson